ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
Utility Working Conference and Vendor Technology Expo (UWC 2024)
August 4–7, 2024
Marco Island, FL|JW Marriott Marco Island
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Vogtle-3 shuts down for valve issue
One of the new Vogtle units in Georgia was shut down unexpectedly on Monday last week for a valve issue that has since been investigated and repaired. According to multiple local news outlets, Georgia Power reported on July 17 that Unit 3 was back in service.
Southern Company spokesperson Jacob Hawkins confirmed that Vogtle-3 went off line at 9:25 p.m. local time on July 8 “due to lowering water levels in the steam generators caused by a valve issue on one of the three main feedwater pumps.”
Richard W. Supler (ENERCON), invited
Proceedings | Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technolgies (NPIC&HMIT 2019) | Orlando, FL, February 9-14, 2019 | Pages 1275-1283
Increasing challenges due to obsolete systems and components, as well as recent market conditions, have driven nuclear power plant (NPP) owners to increase their focus on upgrading outdated analog Instrumentation and Control (I&C) systems to digital as an effective approach for reducing the O&M costs and increasing reliability. As most operating plants in the U.S. have already extended their license to 60 years (and several are preparing for an extension to 80 years), upgrading outdated 1960s and 70s technology to Digital becomes unavoidable. Digital Systems provide the flexibility of software parameterization, calibrations, and setpoint adjustments. Customization of system functionality through software offers almost endless combinations of engineered alarms, self-checks, and automated surveillance checks. The customizability of application software provides operators with a combination of controls with which they are familiar, as well as the capability of new and improved controls and interfaces. To greatly increase the probability of implementing a successful analog to digital upgrade, adequate planning and incorporation of a project life cycle process for an Analog to Digital Control Upgrade is key to ensuring all required Regulatory and Industry Standards are met, especially for Safety Related Applications. One important planning consideration is realizing and understanding the additional I&C Calculation related Uncertainty Errors involved with Digital Systems over and above those evaluated for analog systems. These additional considerations also provide an opportunity to perform reanalysis of prior drift evaluations using historical calibration data, especially for many of the front end analog sensors, to determine if additional margin can be obtained between the setpoints and corresponding Technical Specification Allowable and Analytical Limits. The re-analyzed drift evaluation may allow for reduction of previously assumed uncertainty error values that may have been based on overly conservative vendor specifications rather than actual operational data. The additional margin realized may allow for extension of calibration surveillance frequency intervals resulting in cost savings that could be used towards the upgrade. Also, when an analog instrument loop is replaced with a digital loop, the sensor is often the only component in the loop that is susceptible to drift; therefore, the channel drift is reduced, providing more margin. Conversely, since some instrument loop components are replaced with digital components (e.g., I/O modules, software) new errors could be introduced into the measurement with the use of digital technology (e.g., errors that could result from analog-to digital or digital to analog conversion or from numerical methods used in the software (e.g., curve fitting)). This paper and presentation will present an overview of the additional uncertainty error considerations involved with Nuclear Plant Analog to Digital Controls Upgrades, as well as describing the method and benefits of reevaluating the existing drift evaluations for the existing components that may be reused as part of the upgrade for consideration of extending Calibration Surveillance Frequency Intervals.