ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
“Summer time” again? Santee Cooper thinks so
South Carolina public utility Santee Cooper and its partner South Carolina Electric & Gas (SCE&G) called a halt to the Summer-2 and -3 AP1000 construction project in July 2017, citing costly delays and the bankruptcy of Westinghouse. The well-chronicled legal fallout included indictments and settlements, and ultimately left Santee Cooper with the ownership of nonnuclear assets at the construction site in Jenkinsville, S.C.
B. D. Shumaker, H. M. Hashemian (AMS)
Proceedings | Nuclear Plant Instrumentation, Control, and Human-Machine Interface Technolgies (NPIC&HMIT 2019) | Orlando, FL, February 9-14, 2019 | Pages 941-946
Online monitoring (OLM) technologies have been developed and validated for a variety of applications in nuclear power plants including optimizing maintenance of instrumentation and controls (I&C) systems, detection of process anomalies such as blockages, leaks, voids, flow anomalies, excessive vibration, overheating, and equipment or process deviations from normal behavior. For example, the Sizewell B nuclear power plant (NPP), a Westinghouse pressurized water reactor (PWR) in the United Kingdom (U.K.), implemented OLM for transmitter calibration verification and has been using it effectively for over a decade. With the help of OLM technologies, today Sizewell B is calibrating only those transmitters that are found by OLM to drift beyond acceptable limits plus one transmitter from each redundant set to account for any systematic drift. Since the late 1990’s, several industry organizations, academic institutions, national laboratories, vendors, and others have worked on the application of OLM technologies to extend transmitter calibration intervals in NPPs in the U.S. In fact, in 2000, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) authorizing the use of OLM for transmitter calibration extensions subject to 14 stipulations. However, since that time, no U.S. utility has implemented OLM for transmitter calibration interval extension presumably because the industry found a few of the NRC’s stipulations in the SER to be too restrictive and cost prohibitive to resolve. Today, it has been over 18 years from when the NRC issued the SER and much has happened since then including: 1) successful OLM implementation at Sizewell B with approval of U.K. regulators, 2) OLM implementation at over ten U.S. PWRs on a demonstration basis, 3) continued research by the nuclear industry and academia to address essentially all technical questions and regulatory concerns, 4) Probabilistic Risk Assessment (PRA) work showing the very low risk of extending transmitter calibration intervals, and 5) additional operating experiences (OEs) demonstrating that the current generation of nuclear grade pressure, level, and flow transmitters do not normally drift enough to need a calibration at each refueling outage. These developments have provided sufficient evidence to propel OLM for ready implementation in nuclear power plants and have provided answers to many of the 14 NRC stipulations in the SER. As such, OLM is ready for implementation in U.S. nuclear power plants provided that the NRC can be convinced of its validity, reliability, and safety. This paper provides details of a project conducted by the authors under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) to work with the NRC to document the technical foundation and address the regulatory issues for implementation of OLM to extend the calibration intervals of pressure, level, and flow transmitters in NPPs. The product of this project will be a report to be used by the nuclear industry for guidance on OLM implementation that can satisfy the NRC. As importantly, the product of this work will provide the NRC with the information and data that it needs to review plant applications for OLM implementations.