ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Guanyi Wang, Qingzi Zhu, Mamoru Ishii (Purdue Univ)
Proceedings | Advances in Thermal Hydraulics 2018 | Orlando, FL, November 11-15, 2018 | Pages 77-87
As a critical closure equation to the two-fluid model and an important tool to characterize the two-phase flow interfacial transport, interfacial area transport equation (IATE) was formulated by taking various physical mechanisms causing interface area change into account. To fulfill the dynamic prediction advantage of the IATE and further replace the flow-regime-based constitutive relations, the IATE model should be validated by transition data to ensure the model reliability and robustness. Air-water experiments are performed in bubbly to slug transitions flows in a 200×10 mm narrow rectangular duct. Four-sensor conductivity probes are used to measure the local void fraction, interfacial area concentration, and bubble velocity at three axial locations. The sectional void fraction distribution changes significantly with the flow developing. Flow conditions with similar area-averaged void fraction but different superficial mixture velocities are compared, and it is found that the superficial liquid velocity obviously affect the interfacial area concentration. The measured data with developing spatial distribution would be useful to benchmark and improve the current two-phase flow models used in CFD. Besides, the two-group IATE model for narrow rectangular channel is evaluated using the collected data. The average relative error for the interfacial area concentration prediction is 11.4%, but the group II IAC are overestimated for most flow conditions. To realize better prediction in bubbly to slug transition flows, improvement of the current IATE model is required.