ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
RIC panel discusses pathway to fusion commercialization
Fusion leaders at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s annual Regulatory Information Conference discussed the path forward for regulating the burgeoning fusion industry. The speakers discussed government and private industry initiatives in the United States and United Kingdom, with a focus on efforts shaping the near-term deployment of commercial fusion machines.
A recurring theme was the need to explain the difference between fission and fusion. Representatives from the Department of Energy and Type One Energy highlighted this as an important distinction for regulators, as it will allow fusion to undergo its own independent maturation process for developing standards and regulations in the same way that fission has. Lea Perlas, Fusion Program director at the Virginia Department of Health, said that confusion between fission and fusion has been a common cause for misplaced concerns among community members surrounding Commonwealth Fusion Systems’ proposed fusion plant site near Richmond, Va.
Kenji Yokoyama (JAEA), Takanori Kitada (Osaka Univ)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 1221-1230
As a method to improve the design prediction accuracy by utilizing integral experimental data, the conventional cross-section adjustment method (CA) based on Bayes the- orem is widely used. On the other hand, propositions of the generalized bias factor method (GB) in 2006 and the extended bias factor method (EB) in 2007 have stimulated theoretical study in this field. Subsequently, several new cross-section adjustment methods were proposed: the ex- tended cross-section adjustment method (EA); the cross- section adjustment methods based on minimum variance unbiased estimation (MVUE), which include the MVUE- based rigorous EA (MREA) and the MVUE-based rigorous CA (MRCA); and the dimension-reduced cross-section ad- justment method (DRCA). In the present paper, we applied these methods to a real-scale problem of design prediction accuracy evaluation for a large-size sodium cooled fast re- actor and compared their performances. From these re- sults, we discuss a proper use of these design methods.