ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Eric V. Steinfelds (Western Kentucky Univ), Barry D. Ganapol (Univ of Arizona), Keith Andrew (Western Kentucky Univ)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 721-731
This work focuses on the critical value calculations and the solving of the multi-group neutron diffusion equation, which is frequently introduced in a senior level reactor physics textbook. keff denotes the effective neutron multiplication factor (Ref. 1, Duderstadt). The mathematical structure of solutions and the review of values of the solutions have attained the status of a mature academic subtopic. On the other hand, for the cases of multi-group neutrons, the conventionally known texts of neutron diffusion have not fully succeeded to show the formulations and the vital connections to the relevant numerical calculations in order to directly follow through (without interactive decision steps to proceed) to concisely find the values of keff and/or of critical size, critical enrichment value, etc. In consideration of 2-group diffusion for cylindrically shaped and analogously shaped cores and with neglect of realistic boundary conditions of n-leakage from surface, one can readily find two eigensolutions and with two distinct eigenvalues for buckling in order to satisfy the given values of keff and of the critically sensitive physical parameters such as enrichment. However, if the boundary conditions for the highest energy group and the lowest energy group are not with identical values for the corresponding diffusion lengths, then it becomes significantly difficult to adjust parameters such as enrichment in order to get the buckling quantities of the two eigen-solutions along with the amplitudes selected so as to get the first function of the eigenmode and the second function of the eigenmode of the 2-group system to satisfy all of the boundary conditions required of the reactor core. For a spherical core governed by 2-group neutrons, the scalar flux has the spatial form of sin(B{1} r)/r + C{2}•sinh(B{2} r)/r, where B{1}2 and B{2}2 are the two possible values for buckling (Ref. 2). If this were a one-group neutron reactor, scalar flux would simply equal A{0}•sin(‘BB[o]’ r)/r., and it is simple enough to determine what ‘BB[o]’ equals. However, the expression for 2-group flux has the burden of having B{1}, B{2}, and C{2} to satisfy extrapolation or the Robin boundary conditions (Ref. 3) for neutrons at energy-1 as well as at energy-2. This makes the challenge of determining the contingent relationship of keff with Enrichment Ratio within two-group diffusion more than five times more intensive numerically than it is for onegroup analysis.
This paper offers an insightful method to find keff or alternatively the value of one of the vital critical parameters which either directly or implicitly effects keff. The finite element inspired method used to do this involves the construction of a matrix which has to be solved for keff and a matching critical parameter - such as enrichment or diameter (Ref. 4). A sequence of these matrices can be created: Typically the sequence consists of a 4 by 4 matrix, 6 by 6 matrix, etc. The solutions of the determinants of the matrices in this sequence give us the lowest eigenvalues of either keff or of the first critical parameter. It has been verified in our worked examples and is shown in this paper that this sequence of values of keff or of critical parameter converges to a constant value as the order of the matrix increases. Often, progression to the 12 by 12 matrix is sufficient in order to find the convergent value for cylindrical, spherical, and rectilinear cores.