ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Education, Training & Workforce Development
The Education, Training & Workforce Development Division provides communication among the academic, industrial, and governmental communities through the exchange of views and information on matters related to education, training and workforce development in nuclear and radiological science, engineering, and technology. Industry leaders, education and training professionals, and interested students work together through Society-sponsored meetings and publications, to enrich their professional development, to educate the general public, and to advance nuclear and radiological science and engineering.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Diego Fernández Lisbona, Anastasios Alexiou, Tanya Macleod, Leslie Smith (Office for Nuclear Regulation UK)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 485-493
The Office for Nuclear Regulation (ONR) is the United Kingdom’s (UK) independent regulator of nuclear safety and security. A key requirement of UK law and ONR’s regulatory approach is that licensees build, operate and decommission nuclear sites ensuring that risks are As Low as Reasonably Practicable (ALARP). In line with international guidelines, ONR expects nuclear plants to show hazard resilience by means of layout optimisation and segregation of redundant and diverse safety systems. This generally involves the provision of suitably designed multi-hazard barriers.
The design and qualification of hazard barriers against single internal and external hazard loads is not exempt from difficulties, but generally follows established methodologies that are documented within international standards and design guidelines. However, hazards can often occur in combination, and these can give more significant challenges to the design. A single event initiator e.g. an internal fire or seismic loading can lead to multiple hazards (secondary fires, dropped loads, pipe whip, jet impact, flooding and steam release). These loads can credibly combine on individual barriers with varying degrees of severity depending on hazard ranges, timing and plant geometry.
The identification, screening and consequence assessment of hazard combinations is particularly challenging. This is due to not only the high number of potential combinations, but also due to the inherent uncertainty in hazard frequencies, event progression and potential consequences. Guidance on the assessment of hazard combinations in nuclear plant is notably scarce.
Recent ONR experience in safety case assessment has shown the importance of coordinated, multi-disciplinary approaches in the development of resilient designs against combined hazards. In this paper, ONR Internal Hazards, External Hazards and Civil Engineering specialists provide a critical appraisal of the following aspects of combined hazards assessment:
• Challenges in the identification and screening of hazard combinations;
• Methods for characterisation of combined hazard loads and barrier design and substantiation;
• Uncertainty and margins of safety.
The paper presents expectations and recent challenges in evaluating resilience against combined hazards in the context of Nuclear New build installations which have recently undergone Generic Design Assessment (GDA) in the UK.
