ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
DNFSB spots possible bottleneck in Hanford’s waste vitrification
Workers change out spent 27,000-pound TSCR filter columns and place them on a nearby storage pad during a planned outage in 2023. (Photo: DOE)
While the Department of Energy recently celebrated the beginning of hot commissioning of the Hanford Site’s Waste Treatment and Immobilization Plant (WTP), which has begun immobilizing the site’s radioactive tank waste in glass through vitrification, the Defense Nuclear Facilities Safety Board has reported a possible bottleneck in waste processing. According to the DNFSB, unless current systems run efficiently, the issue could result in the interruption of operations at the WTP’s Low-Activity Waste Facility, where waste vitrification takes place.
During operations, the LAW Facility will process an average of 5,300 gallons of tank waste per day, according to Bechtel, the contractor leading design, construction, and commissioning of the WTP. That waste is piped to the facility after being treated by Hanford’s Tanks Side Cesium Removal (TSCR) system, which filters undissolved solid material and removes cesium from liquid waste.
According to a November 7 activity report by the DNFSB, the TSCR system may not be able to produce waste feed fast enough to keep up with the LAW Facility’s vitrification rate.
Akshay Dave, Yu-Jou Wang, Lin-Wen Hu, Kaichao Sun (MIT), Joseph Nielsen, Paul Murray, Ryan Marlow (INL)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 156-164
The current safety basis (SAR-153) for the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) ensures that the plant protection criteria is maintained for all Condition 2 events by verifying that, for a Condition 2 Flow Coastdown Transient and Condition 2 Reactivity Insertion Accident, the Departure from Nucleate Boiling (DNB) Ratio (DNBR) is greater than two. The basis used to establish this limit is not well defined but may be traced to research reactor licensing based on overly conservative thermal hydraulic criteria. This limitation may not be applicable to reactor experiments because the quantity of fissionable material and fission product inventory in experiments is much less than that of the reactor core, and may prevent or limit future experimental testing in the ATR. In particular, fueled experiments may be excluded from irradiation in ATR if the desired fission power cannot be achieved due to these safety criteria.
This study will evaluate the DNBR using various CHF correlations and consider the impacts of changing the limit to a more suitable thermal hydraulic safety limit for fueled experiments, such as Onset of Nucleate Boiling (ONB), Onset of Significant Voiding (OSV), and Onset of Flow Instability (OFI). The study utilizes a BEPU (best-estimate plus uncertainty) statistical approach that maintains 3? from thermal hydraulic safety limit during Condition 2 transients. Modeling parameters of different correlations will be evaluated by considering the associated uncertainties. The study will eventually provide recommendations to support any safety basis changes that can expand the experimental operating envelope of the ATR without a compromise in safety.
The preliminary results indicate that large safety margins can be kept for Critical Heat Flux (CHF) based DNB at almost all conditions. DNBR only reaches slightly below two when using Groeneveld’s CHF Look-up Table (LUT) at peak transient condition with all conservative power multipliers applied. At all studied conditions, OFI ratios are found always greater than two and significant margins have been kept from OSV. ONB only occurs at steady-state when all conservative power multipliers are applied. Preliminary results involving an additional method with Dakota/RAVEN coupled to RELAP5 is presented.