ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Robotics & Remote Systems
The Mission of the Robotics and Remote Systems Division is to promote the development and application of immersive simulation, robotics, and remote systems for hazardous environments for the purpose of reducing hazardous exposure to individuals, reducing environmental hazards and reducing the cost of performing work.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
April 2025
Latest News
Nuclear News 40 Under 40 discuss the future of nuclear
Seven members of the inaugural Nuclear News 40 Under 40 came together on March 4 to discuss the current state of nuclear energy and what the future might hold for science, industry, and the public in terms of nuclear development.
To hear more insights from this talented group of young professionals, watch the “40 Under 40 Roundtable: Perspectives from Nuclear’s Rising Stars” on the ANS website.
Jordan Cox, Brian Woods (Oregon State Univ)
Proceedings | 2018 International Congress on Advances in Nuclear Power Plants (ICAPP 2018) | Charlotte, NC, April 8-11, 2018 | Pages 94-102
The pebble bed reactor (PBR) is generation IV reactor design that is highly efficient and passively safe. The core of a PBR consists of a silo full of graphite pebbles filled with tristructural-isotropic fuel. This fuel acts as both a moderator and radiation isotope containment preventing the release of fission biproducts. The fuel elements are first piled in the core until criticality is reached. As burnup occur, the fuel elements are recycled from the bottom of the core and replaced at the top of the core. With each pass the fuel is measured for burnup. If it is below the burnup limit, and has not received significant structural damage, it is recycled. If not, it will be placed directly in dry casks for storage. Because of its inert nature, there is no need for cutting or processing before storage. A fuel element is designed to stay in the core for roughly 3 years.
Both the fuel elements, and core structure material are composed mostly of graphite. This graphite will experience significant property changes based on both the thermal expansion, and the neutron irradiation. These changes include the Young’s modulus, Poisson’s ratio, density and swelling, and coefficient of thermal conductivity. The effects of irradiation on the core structure material, and the resulting core behavior, has been well studied. Previously the effect of dynamic properties of the graphite fuel pebbles due to irradiation has been assumed negligible.
With advances in computing power, it has become feasible to model graphite fuel element property changes and their effect on the core geometry and maximum pebble temperatures. This modelling can be accomplished using the discrete element method (DEM). In this paper the discrete element method is described. Previous research on graphite property changes based on temperature and irradiation dose is summarized. This previous research was used to augment the discrete element method with dynamic graphite pebble properties. The core was simulated over a three-year period with graphite pebble property changes. In this study the forces are examined. It was shown that the dynamic property changes lead to unsafe changes in pebble forces. These estimates are consistent with previous reactors and show that dynamic property changes could be better used to model the PBR core.