ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Robotics & Remote Systems
The Mission of the Robotics and Remote Systems Division is to promote the development and application of immersive simulation, robotics, and remote systems for hazardous environments for the purpose of reducing hazardous exposure to individuals, reducing environmental hazards and reducing the cost of performing work.
Meeting Spotlight
2027 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
October 31–November 4, 2027
Washington, DC|The Westin Washington, DC Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Nov 2024
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
December 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2024
Latest News
Disney World should have gone nuclear
There is extra significance to the American Nuclear Society holding its annual meeting in Orlando, Florida, this past week. That’s because in 1967, the state of Florida passed a law allowing Disney World to build a nuclear power plant.
Bret van den Akker, Abiodun Adeniyi (ORNL), Halim Alsaed (Enviro Nuclear Services), Jim Blink (Beckman & Assoc), Joe Carter, Tom Severynse, Bob Jones (SRNL)
Proceedings | 16th International High-Level Radioactive Waste Management Conference (IHLRWM 2017) | Charlotte, NC, April 9-13, 2017 | Pages 402-409
Spent nuclear fuel (SNF) assemblies are stored in pools or dry casks at commercial reactor sites pending transfer to an interim storage facility (ISF) or a geologic repository for disposal. The cost of disposal will be dependent on the repository’s geology and size, as well as the number and size of waste packages requiring emplacement. To meet acceptance criteria for repository waste package loading, fuel in dry storage may require repackaging into smaller quantities. A modular packaging facility design has been developed for fuel stored in dry casks at reactor sites or an ISF, as well as bare fuel assemblies shipped directly from reactor fuel pools. This facility provides for receipt and packaging of 1,500 metric tons (MT) of fuel annually. Three sizes of storage, transportation and disposal canisters have been evaluated (a 4 pressurized water reactor (PWR)/9 boiling water reactor (BWR) can-in-carrier concept, a 12-PWR/32-BWR fuel canister, and a 21-PWR/44-BWR fuel canister) to determine the effect on facility throughput. Cost estimates have been developed for the packaging facility, and operating costs have been determined for packaging 1,500 MT of SNF per year.
Higher throughputs could be achieved for bare fuel because process steps for transfer and opening of the dual-purpose canister (DPC) are not necessary. Results from system modeling indicate that even for the more restrictive case where all fuel is received in DPCs, the desired throughput of 1,500 MT/year could be attained for the receipt basis of 1,000 MT PWR and 500 MT BWR fuel. Transfer of the fuel from transportation casks (TCs) (bare fuel) or DPCs to disposal canisters would be performed in a pool. The loaded canisters would be sealed, dried, and leak tested prior to being loaded into TCs for transport to a geologic repository or to an ISF. Additional facilities would be provided for decontamination of the TCs for reuse, as well as decontamination of the empty DPCs for disposal as low level radioactive waste (LLW). Conceptual layout and elevation drawings have been developed for a wet packaging facility to provide ~30,000 square feet of process area on two levels for cask and canister handling operations, 9,600 square feet for packaging operations in the fuel handling pool, and ~20,000 square feet for railcar receipt and dispatch of TCs. Capital and annual operating cost estimates have been developed and are in the range of $1.3B–$1.5B for capital costs and $190M–$256M for annual operating costs, depending on the canister chosen for repackaging.