ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Operations & Power
Members focus on the dissemination of knowledge and information in the area of power reactors with particular application to the production of electric power and process heat. The division sponsors meetings on the coverage of applied nuclear science and engineering as related to power plants, non-power reactors, and other nuclear facilities. It encourages and assists with the dissemination of knowledge pertinent to the safe and efficient operation of nuclear facilities through professional staff development, information exchange, and supporting the generation of viable solutions to current issues.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
C. Theis, D. Forkel-Wirth, D. Lacarrère, S. Roesler, H. Vincke
Nuclear Technology | Volume 168 | Number 3 | December 2009 | Pages 713-718
Accelerators | Special Issue on the 11th International Conference on Radiation Shielding and the 15th Topical Meeting of the Radiation Protection and Shielding Division (PART 3) / Radiation Protection | doi.org/10.13182/NT09-A9295
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Operating a high-energy accelerator like the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) requires a state-of-the-art monitoring system for radiation protection. In the vicinity of the accelerator as well as in the accessible areas behind thick shielding, a unique mixed radiation environment is encountered that consists of different particle types with energies ranging from fractions of electron volt up to several giga-electron-volts. Consequently, the correct assessment of ambient dose equivalent poses a challenging task and requires appropriate field-specific calibration methods, in particular as no adequate calibration sources exist. This circumstance motivated the development of a more accurate field calibration method for the LHC, based on benchmarked FLUKA Monte Carlo simulations. The method of obtaining such field calibration coefficients for IG5 high-pressure ionization chambers is exemplified in a case study for the LHCb experiment. Comparing these factors to calibration source-based values shows over- or underestimation of the actual dose by the source-based coefficient, depending on the location of the monitor.