ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Young Members Group
The Young Members Group works to encourage and enable all young professional members to be actively involved in the efforts and endeavors of the Society at all levels (Professional Divisions, ANS Governance, Local Sections, etc.) as they transition from the role of a student to the role of a professional. It sponsors non-technical workshops and meetings that provide professional development and networking opportunities for young professionals, collaborates with other Divisions and Groups in developing technical and non-technical content for topical and national meetings, encourages its members to participate in the activities of the Groups and Divisions that are closely related to their professional interests as well as in their local sections, introduces young members to the rules and governance structure of the Society, and nominates young professionals for awards and leadership opportunities available to members.
Meeting Spotlight
International Conference on Mathematics and Computational Methods Applied to Nuclear Science and Engineering (M&C 2025)
April 27–30, 2025
Denver, CO|The Westin Denver Downtown
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
TerraPower begins U.K. regulatory approval process
Seattle-based TerraPower signaled its interest this week in building its Natrium small modular reactor in the United Kingdom, the company announced.
TerraPower sent a letter to the U.K.’s Department for Energy Security and Net Zero, formally establishing its intention to enter the U.K. generic design assessment (GDA) process. This is TerraPower’s first step in deployment of its Natrium technology—a 345-MW sodium fast reactor coupled with a molten salt energy storage unit—on the international stage.
Federico Hattab, Fabio Giannetti, Vincenzo Narcisi, Pierdomenico Lorusso, Filippo Bussoletti, Michael Epstein, Sung Jin Lee, Mariano Tarantino
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 4 | April 2024 | Pages 543-564
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2173482
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper presents an assessment aimed at evaluating primary heat exchanger (PHE) failure of the Westinghouse Electric Company Lead-cooled Fast Reactor (LFR) and at designing a facility for testing phenomena involved in such failure. The system thermal-hydraulic code RELAP5/MOD3.3 was used to develop a transient analysis simulation at reactor scale. Because of RELAP5/MOD3.3’s inability to mix working fluids, the steam injection effect was evaluated using the SIMMER-III code. The limits and strengths of both codes are highlighted throughout the paper. The reactor-scale steady-state results are in good agreement with the nominal operating condition. The transient results show that lead pool surface level variation and primary system pressurization during the PHE failure event are limited.
The PHE failure testing facility was characterized, and a preliminary layout was developed. A separate-effects transient inside the vessel was analyzed with SIMMER-III and RELAP5/MOD3.3 runs. The simulation outcomes have provided useful data to inform subsequent design stages for the test facility. Different configurations of the facility have been assessed, highlighting the strengths and weaknesses of each design. The most important issue was identified to be lead pool swelling, reaching the vessel’s lid and blocking the pressure relief vent. This poses a safety hazard that must be addressed and has been raised for resolution in subsequent design stages. The so-called V4 configuration is suggested as a starting point for further improvement of the facility. Furthermore, a smaller failure opening and lower lead level in the vessel are suggested.