ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
October 2025
Nuclear Technology
September 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Shifting the paradigm of supply chain
Chad Wolf
When I began my nuclear career, I was coached up in the nuclear energy culture of the day to “run silent, run deep,” a mindset rooted in the U.S. Navy’s submarine philosophy. That was the norm—until Fukushima.
The nuclear renaissance that many had envisioned hit a wall. The focus shifted from expansion to survival. Many utility communications efforts pivoted from silence to broadcast, showcasing nuclear energy’s elegance and reliability. Nevertheless, despite being clean baseload 24/7 power that delivered a 90 percent capacity factor or higher, nuclear energy was painted as risky and expensive (alongside energy policies and incentives that favored renewables).
Economics became a driving force threatening to shutter nuclear power. The Delivering the Nuclear Promise initiative launched in 2015 challenged the industry to sustain high performance yet cut costs by up to 30 percent.
J. Sercombe, V. D’Ambrosi, S. Béjaoui, I. Zacharie-Aubrun
Nuclear Technology | Volume 210 | Number 2 | February 2024 | Pages 269-284
Research Article | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2023.2188138
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper presents 2D(r,) simulations of the HBC-4 power-to-melt experiment performed with the fuel performance code ALCYONE. The HBC-4 experiment is one of the two test cases selected for the simulation exercise on past fuel melting experiments of the Power to Melt and Maneuverability (P2M) project. The ramp terminal level (RTL) at peak power node (PPN) has been estimated at 66 kW·m−1 by gamma scanning and 70 kW·m−1 based on online measurements of thermal fluxes. The fuel burnup at PPN was close to 60 GWd/tU−1. The cladding failed during the short holding time at a RTL of 40 s. Fuel melting took place at the pellet center, and in particular, in front of clad cracks.
In this paper, simulations of the HBC-4 power-to-melt experiment are performed using an updated version of the 2D(r,) scheme of ALCYONE where half of the fuel pellet is described. This configuration allows for the modeling of clad failure by iodine stress corrosion cracking and of its consequences on fuel pellet deformation. The modeling of fuel melting relies on thermochemical equilibrium calculations performed with the OpenCalphad Gibbs Energy Minimizer and the Thermodynamics of Advanced Fuels International Database. The simulation without clad failure indicates that the solidus is reached during the HBC-4 experiment but not the liquidus. The simulation with clad failure leads to a small increase in the fuel temperature that is sufficient to reach the liquidus at the pellet center, in agreement with postirradiation examination (PIE). The impact of water ingress in the rod and vaporization at the pellet surface is discussed, showing that it could explain the pronounced swelling of the fuel pellet reported from the PIE.
