ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Annual Conference
June 16–19, 2024
Las Vegas, NV|Mandalay Bay Resort and Casino
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
May 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
June 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
G7 pledges support for nuclear at Italy meeting
The Group of Seven (G7) recommitted its support for nuclear energy in the countries that opt to use it at a Ministerial Meeting on Climate in Italy last month.
In a statement following the April meeting, the group committed to support multilateral efforts to strengthen the resilience of nuclear supply chains, referencing the goal set by 25 countries during last year’s COP28 climate conference in Dubai to triple global nuclear generating capacity by 2050.
Philip H. Sewell, Robert B. Hayes
Nuclear Technology | Volume 209 | Number 6 | June 2023 | Pages 835-856
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2022.2157662
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
To develop the criticality safety basis for any system, process, or package, the worst-case configuration of materials resulting in the maximum system reactivity must be determined. It is commonly accepted that in terms of the maximum system reactivity, at the lower enrichments used in current commercial practice (i.e., 5 wt% 235U), a heterogeneous configuration is bounding of a homogeneous mixture of fissile and moderating materials. However, a common assumption made is that with increasing enrichment, a homogeneous system can be bounding. With increased industry interest in utilizing higher enrichments for commercial applications with low-enriched uranium (LEU+) (≤10 wt% 235U), and high assay low-enriched uranium (HALEU) (≤20 wt% 235U) materials, it has become increasingly important to verify any assumptions and to have a better understanding of the expected system behavior at these higher enrichments.
The SCALE code system was used to assess the effects of heterogeneity on system reactivity with varying enrichments and system configurations for a UO2 and water system, typical of a transportation package criticality analysis. The purpose of this assessment was to provide insight on the effect of material heterogeneity on system reactivity with increasing enrichment. The results of this study confirm that for systems with a higher hydrogen-to–fissile material (H/X) ratio, the homogeneous mixture of material may be bounding for HALEU materials. However, for systems with a lower hydrogen-to–fissile material ratio (H/X ≤ 200), a heterogeneous configuration of contents is expected to be bounding for most LEU materials. Overall, for any LEU system, including HALEU material, heterogeneous reactivity effects should always be considered.