ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Decommissioning & Environmental Sciences
The mission of the Decommissioning and Environmental Sciences (DES) Division is to promote the development and use of those skills and technologies associated with the use of nuclear energy and the optimal management and stewardship of the environment, sustainable development, decommissioning, remediation, reutilization, and long-term surveillance and maintenance of nuclear-related installations, and sites. The target audience for this effort is the membership of the Division, the Society, and the public at large.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
F. D’Auria, D. Bestion
Nuclear Technology | Volume 208 | Number 6 | June 2022 | Pages 990-1011
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1997059
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the domain of reactor transient simulation, the identification of thermal-hydraulic phenomena (THPs) plays a major role. The system codes should model all influential THPs and should be validated against integral effect tests and separate effect tests which cover all influential THPs. The validation and the uncertainty quantification should cover every model related to an influential THP. A list of 116 THPs, recently established, covers all water-cooled reactors and design basis accident (DBA) analyses. It synthesizes more than 30 years of Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development and International Atomic Energy Agency activities conducted by several safety specialists. A new tentative method to identify THPs was proposed based on two sources of information, the parameter evolutions in transients (depressurization, voiding, refill, heating, ...) and the set of balance equations with source and sink terms for convection, diffusion, interfacial transfers, and wall transfers. This method is just based on Gen-2 pressurized water reactor (PWR) transient analysis at the system, component, and basic process levels.
The comparison of the 116 THP list with the list of the tentative methods is made in this paper for the particular case of GEN-2 PWRs. No major contradiction was found. Both methods identified phenomena at the system, component, and process level. The 116 list better identified special components that require “special models” in system codes. The use of equations identified many more local process THPs, which may help ranking phenomena in a scaling analysis and identifying validation needs. The comparison confirms a potential synergy and complementarity between approach 1, which is based on the 116 THP list, and approach 2, which is based on the tentative method; the outcome of this comparison suggests further efforts to combine them and complement them in a new international collaborative context.
This analysis reports ongoing discussions between members of the Forum and Network of System Thermal Hydraulics Codes in Nuclear Reactor Thermal-Hydraulics network of system code developers.