ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Norway’s Halden reactor takes first step toward decommissioning
The government of Norway has granted the transfer of the Halden research reactor from the Institute for Energy Technology (IFE) to the state agency Norwegian Nuclear Decommissioning (NND). The 25-MWt Halden boiling water reactor operated from 1958 to 2018 and was used in the research of nuclear fuel, reactor internals, plant procedures and monitoring, and human factors.
Richard R. Trewin
Nuclear Technology | Volume 208 | Number 5 | May 2022 | Pages 860-870
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1964312
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The ability to extend the operating life of a pressurized water reactor depends in part on the ability of the reactor pressure vessel to withstand thermal shock concurrent with significant pressure. If during the course of a small-break loss-of-coolant accident (SBLOCA), the primary-side pressure is reduced sufficiently, cold make-up water is supplied to the cold leg by the emergency core cooling system. If incomplete mixing occurs between the cold injected water and the hot water in the primary circuit, a stream of cool water flows along the bottom of the cold leg into the downcomer. There, the cool water forms a downward-flowing buoyant plume surrounded by the hot water in the downcomer. The time-dependent spatial distributions of the temperatures and heat transfer coefficients on the inside surface of the reactor pressure vessel are important in determining compliance with regulatory requirements. The simulation of the mixing in the cold leg and downcomer is typically performed with flow-mixing computer codes, most of which use either computational fluid dynamics techniques or mechanistic models. The computer code used for this work, called KWU-MIX, makes use of mechanistic models. In previous works, the uncertainties in parameters associated with the most important phenomena that contribute to the temperature distributions were quantified by comparing experimentally derived values of the parameters with values from the mechanistic models. In this work, those uncertainties are propagated through the flow-mixing code in order to quantify the uncertainty in the calculated temperature distributions. An example of the propagation of uncertainties is given for conditions typical of a SBLOCA. Random values from each of the uncertainty distributions for the parameters of all of the most important phenomena were selected for each of 100 simulations of the typical accident conditions. The results of the 100 simulations were analyzed statistically in order to quantify the best-estimate temperature distribution and its uncertainty. The resulting best-estimate temperature distribution and its uncertainty were compared with experimental data obtained in the Upper Plenum Test Facility at the same typical accident conditions. The results of the comparison show that the uncertainty in the calculated temperature distribution bounds the experimental values.