ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Operations & Power
Members focus on the dissemination of knowledge and information in the area of power reactors with particular application to the production of electric power and process heat. The division sponsors meetings on the coverage of applied nuclear science and engineering as related to power plants, non-power reactors, and other nuclear facilities. It encourages and assists with the dissemination of knowledge pertinent to the safe and efficient operation of nuclear facilities through professional staff development, information exchange, and supporting the generation of viable solutions to current issues.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Richard R. Trewin
Nuclear Technology | Volume 208 | Number 5 | May 2022 | Pages 860-870
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2021.1964312
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The ability to extend the operating life of a pressurized water reactor depends in part on the ability of the reactor pressure vessel to withstand thermal shock concurrent with significant pressure. If during the course of a small-break loss-of-coolant accident (SBLOCA), the primary-side pressure is reduced sufficiently, cold make-up water is supplied to the cold leg by the emergency core cooling system. If incomplete mixing occurs between the cold injected water and the hot water in the primary circuit, a stream of cool water flows along the bottom of the cold leg into the downcomer. There, the cool water forms a downward-flowing buoyant plume surrounded by the hot water in the downcomer. The time-dependent spatial distributions of the temperatures and heat transfer coefficients on the inside surface of the reactor pressure vessel are important in determining compliance with regulatory requirements. The simulation of the mixing in the cold leg and downcomer is typically performed with flow-mixing computer codes, most of which use either computational fluid dynamics techniques or mechanistic models. The computer code used for this work, called KWU-MIX, makes use of mechanistic models. In previous works, the uncertainties in parameters associated with the most important phenomena that contribute to the temperature distributions were quantified by comparing experimentally derived values of the parameters with values from the mechanistic models. In this work, those uncertainties are propagated through the flow-mixing code in order to quantify the uncertainty in the calculated temperature distributions. An example of the propagation of uncertainties is given for conditions typical of a SBLOCA. Random values from each of the uncertainty distributions for the parameters of all of the most important phenomena were selected for each of 100 simulations of the typical accident conditions. The results of the 100 simulations were analyzed statistically in order to quantify the best-estimate temperature distribution and its uncertainty. The resulting best-estimate temperature distribution and its uncertainty were compared with experimental data obtained in the Upper Plenum Test Facility at the same typical accident conditions. The results of the comparison show that the uncertainty in the calculated temperature distribution bounds the experimental values.