ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy
The mission of the Nuclear Nonproliferation Policy Division (NNPD) is to promote the peaceful use of nuclear technology while simultaneously preventing the diversion and misuse of nuclear material and technology through appropriate safeguards and security, and promotion of nuclear nonproliferation policies. To achieve this mission, the objectives of the NNPD are to: Promote policy that discourages the proliferation of nuclear technology and material to inappropriate entities. Provide information to ANS members, the technical community at large, opinion leaders, and decision makers to improve their understanding of nuclear nonproliferation issues. Become a recognized technical resource on nuclear nonproliferation, safeguards, and security issues. Serve as the integration and coordination body for nuclear nonproliferation activities for the ANS. Work cooperatively with other ANS divisions to achieve these objective nonproliferation policies.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
November 17–21, 2024
Orlando, FL|Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2024
Latest News
Nuclear new build procurement considerations
It may seem counterintuitive, but the best time to enhance the ability to support operations and maintenance for a new plant is before construction starts. This is one of many lessons learned by the currently operating nuclear fleet. As construction and startup of many nuclear facilities was completed, it quickly became evident that the ability to efficiently support operations and maintenance was limited. Most of the information necessary to establish and manage procurement of spare and replacement items, maintenance, and configuration of the facilities was unavailable and had to be gathered on a case-by-case, “on-demand” basis. Absence of necessary information and the associated challenges resulted in the need for staff augmentation and multiyear-long projects to develop equipment bills of material and maintenance programs and to perform technical evaluations for the huge quantities of spare and replacement items being requested.
Chan Soo Kim, Byung Ha Park, Eung Seon Kim, Min Hwan Kim
Nuclear Technology | Volume 206 | Number 9 | September 2020 | Pages 1397-1408
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1735228
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Korea Atomic Energy Research Institute (KAERI) has developed the Core Reliable Optimization and thermofluid Network Analysis (CORONA) code for core thermofluid analysis of a prismatic high-temperature gas-cooled reactor (HTGR). KAERI performed scaled-down standard fuel block (SFB) heated tests at a helium experimental loop to validate the CORONA code. The scaled-down SFB was designed based on the core thermofluid design for a 350-MW(thermal) HTGR. The reference test condition was selected to maintain the Reynolds number of the coolant channels and the bypass gaps. The test section had seven coolant holes and 12 fuel holes considering KAERI’s helium loop circulator design. The material of the fuel block was Al2O3, selected to simulate the low thermal conductivity of the irradiated graphite at the high-temperature condition. The bypass gap structure was made of stainless steel 304 to minimize gap size deformation at the heated condition. This paper presents a comparison between the test results and the CORONA analysis results. The test parameter was the nitrogen flow velocity (3.6 to 6.0 kg/min) and constant heated condition.