ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Amy Hall, Daniel A. Gum, Richard Ferrieri, John Brockman, James E. Bevins
Nuclear Technology | Volume 206 | Number 7 | July 2020 | Pages 962-976
Technical Paper – Special section on the 2019 ANS Student Conference | doi.org/10.1080/00295450.2020.1740561
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The General Electric (GE®) PETtrace 860 cyclotron at the Missouri University Research Reactor (MURR) facility is used extensively for medical and research radioisotope production. However, no model exists of its performance, and the proton beam’s energy and spatial distribution are unmeasured. Here, an MCNP6 model was developed to improve upon the performance of the cyclotron target systems that are routinely utilized for research and medical radioisotope production. Since the cyclotron beam energy and profile have a significant impact on the efficiency and character of radioisotope production, the MURR cyclotron proton beam energy was measured using high-purity copper stacked foil activation to be 14.6 ± 0.2 MeV, a significant reduction from the stated 16.4 MeV. Phosphor plate imaging was also used to radiographically image the distribution of radioisotope production within the copper foils and characterize the beam spatial and intensity profile. Total target activity was quantified by trapping the 11C on a solid adsorbent and measuring the amount in an ion chamber. Effective target densities were calculated for irradiations conducted with beam currents between 5 and 40 μA. The measured beam and target characteristics were used to develop an MCNP6 model of 11C production. Through use of the model, it was determined that the targets were, at most, 41% efficient as a thick target design resulting in up to 11.80-MeV average protons impinging on the target walls leading to potential contamination from hot ion recoils.