ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Human Factors, Instrumentation & Controls
Improving task performance, system reliability, system and personnel safety, efficiency, and effectiveness are the division's main objectives. Its major areas of interest include task design, procedures, training, instrument and control layout and placement, stress control, anthropometrics, psychological input, and motivation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Hyungrae Kim, Yoon Yeong Bae, Hwan Yeol Kim, Jin Ho Song, Bong Hyun Cho
Nuclear Technology | Volume 164 | Number 1 | October 2008 | Pages 119-129
Technical Paper | Icapp '06 | doi.org/10.13182/NT08-A4013
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The SuperCritical Water-cooled Reactor (SCWR) is one of the candidates for the fourth-generation nuclear power plant, and it uses light water as a coolant. Heat transfer between a fuel assembly and water may degrade at certain conditions of supercritical pressure flows. Therefore, accurate and reliable estimation of heat transfer coefficients is necessary for the design of the fuel assembly and the reactor core. A series of heat transfer tests has been carried out at a test facility named SPHINX by using carbon dioxide as a stimulant of water. The tests produced heat transfer data of the supercritical pressure flows inside a circular tube of 4.4-mm inside diameter at varying operating pressures, mass fluxes, and wall heat fluxes. The test range of the mass flux was 400 to 1200 kg/m2 s, and the maximum heat flux was 150 kW/m2. The operating pressures were 7.75, 8.12, and 8.85 MPa in the tests. The test results were compared with estimations of the existing correlations for supercritical pressure flows. The comparison showed reasonable agreement between our data and the correlations. However, a rather large departure from the normal heat transfer correlations was observed near pseudocritical temperatures. Besides the comparison of the normal heat transfer coefficients, the onset of heat transfer deterioration was compared between the test cases and two existing criteria. One of the criteria was derived from experiments by using Freon but with a test section of identical geometry while the other criterion was for a flow of carbon dioxide in a larger bore channel than ours. Both criteria showed fair agreement with our experiment. Most test cases with noticeable heat transfer degradation were located in the region of deterioration predicted by the criteria.