ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Operations & Power
Members focus on the dissemination of knowledge and information in the area of power reactors with particular application to the production of electric power and process heat. The division sponsors meetings on the coverage of applied nuclear science and engineering as related to power plants, non-power reactors, and other nuclear facilities. It encourages and assists with the dissemination of knowledge pertinent to the safe and efficient operation of nuclear facilities through professional staff development, information exchange, and supporting the generation of viable solutions to current issues.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Timothy C. Kessler, Gary B. Fader
Nuclear Technology | Volume 34 | Number 2 | July 1977 | Pages 209-216
Technical Paper | Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT77-A39698
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The requirements for an emergency core cooling system (ECCS) evaluation model that is acceptable for a pressurized water reactor licensing analysis are detailed in Appendix K to 10CFR50. The purpose of these requirements is to ensure that such an analysis will yield a conservative upper bound to the maximum cladding temperature and cladding oxidation that can result from a postulated loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA). By its nature, therefore, this model is inappropriate to indicate the actual anticipated results of a LOCA. Furthermore, a quantitative assessment of the conservatism inherent in the licensing model is unavailable. To produce realistic LOCA results, a calculation was performed at Combustion Engineering (C-E) for the reactor in its System 80™ nuclear steam supply system, using a best-judgment ECCS evaluation model. The best-judgment model is a C-E first-generation best-estimate model that uses the basic Appendix K licensing computer programs, but in which the bounding conservatisms required by Appendix K are relaxed for selected parameters and models of primary concern in a LOCA analysis. The important differences between the best-judgment model and the Appendix K licensing model are as follows: 1. In the best-judgment calculation, nominal values of certain reactor system parameters were used in place of the bounding, conservative values assumed in the licensing calculation. Of primary importance are the relaxation of the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC)-imposed double-ended guillotine break, and 20% contingency on the American National Standards standard decay heat generation curve. Nominal values were also assumed for the containment building physical parameters and wall condensing heat transfer coefficients, which influence the calculation of transient containment pressure. 2. It was assumed that offsite power was lost upon pipe rupture, but that auxiliary power from the diesel generators was available to active ECCS and other safeguard components following the normal startup and loading sequence. All active safeguard systems were assumed to be operating at nominal capacity in their most likely condition throughout the accident. Power, from the coasting-down turbine generator, was maintained to the reactor coolant system pumps during the blowdown, and the pump rotor was assumed to coast down during reflood. 3. A critical flow model deemed by C-E to be appropriate for break flow rate calculations was used. In the licensing LOCA analysis, the maximum local power density was adjusted such that the Appendix K model yielded a peak clad temperature approximately equal to the criteria limit of 2200°F (1204°C), thus establishing a corresponding operating limit. The best-judgment calculation, performed at the same indicated peak local power density, yielded a maximum clad temperature that was 980°F (544°C) lower than that predicted by the Appendix K model. At such low temperatures, clad oxidation and rupture will not occur. An additional calculation was performed in which the peak local power density was decreased to a value that permits full-power operation, but limited operating flexibility; the maximum cladding temperature decreased an additional 100°F (56°C). Although no attempt has been made to specify a statistical confidence level for either the assumptions or the results of this analysis, it is evident that predictions of the consequences of a LOCA that are obtained from an ECCS evaluation model conforming to 10CFR50, Appendix K, are extremely conservative.