ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Luciano Burgazzi
Nuclear Technology | Volume 161 | Number 1 | January 2008 | Pages 1-7
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT08-A3908
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The focus of the present study is passive system reliability assessment, with reference to the thermal-hydraulic passive systems (i.e., relying on natural circulation). An approach based on system-relevant performance parameters is introduced to provide system-significant availability and reliability figures, within a reliability physics framework.The method exploits the fact that for thermal-hydraulic passive systems to perform as expected to accomplish the required mission, parameters must lie between certain limits according to defined safety criteria. Some relevant physical parameters are worth considering as significant indicators of thermal-hydraulic passive system performance, for instance coolant flow or exchanged thermal power. Within this methodology, the selected representative parameters defining the system performance are properly modeled through the construction of joint probability functions in order to assess the correspondent functional reliability. The application of the methodology to a realistic passive system design is illustrated.The results are shown to point out the relevance of the passive system functional reliability aspects with respect to the classical mechanical component malfunctions, serving as a foundation for continuous improvement of the passive system reliability assessment process.This paper aims to remedy some of the limitations following on from applying the functional reliability approach to the passive system reliability problem, as highlighted in an earlier paper [Nuclear Technology, Vol. 144, p. 145 (Nov. 2003)]. This concerns essentially the assumption of independence between the marginal distributions to construct the joint probability distributions to evaluate system reliability.