ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
August 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
ANS joins others in seeking to discuss SNF/HLW impasse
The American Nuclear Society joined seven other organizations to send a letter to Energy Secretary Christopher Wright on July 8, asking to meet with him to discuss “the restoration of a highly functioning program to meet DOE’s legal responsibility to manage and dispose of the nation’s commercial and legacy defense spent nuclear fuel (SNF) and high-level radioactive waste (HLW).”
Xingang Zhao, Koroush Shirvan, Yingwei Wu, Mujid S. Kazimi
Nuclear Technology | Volume 196 | Number 3 | December 2016 | Pages 553-567
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NT16-45
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
With the objective of providing long-term energy supply via actinide breeding and burning, the next-generation boiling water reactor (BWR) design, the Hitachi’s resource-renewable BWR (RBWR), has been proposed. Unlike a traditional square lattice BWR fuel bundle, the RBWR bundles are shorter with hexagonal tight lattice arrangement and heterogeneous axial fuel zoning. The RBWR’s different core geometry combined with the higher power-to-flow ratio and void fraction necessitates the reexamination of the standard BWR thermal-hydraulic models.
For the prediction of dryout, the previously derived best-estimate empirical correlation showed significant scatter when compared to experimental data within its calibration database. In this work, the correlation is further calibrated and improved by supplementing tight bundle data with relevant critical power data for tubes and annuli to better quantify the effects of various parameters and by incorporating subchannel-level results to account for intra-assembly flow mixing. Another approach using the mechanistic three-field model is also investigated, and the minimum critical power ratio of the RBWR design is evaluated.
For the prediction of void fraction, measurements and the three-field model in annular flow regime reveal that the common drift flux approaches tend to overestimate the void fraction at small hydraulic diameters. The void fraction dependence on hydraulic diameter below 10 mm requires further experimentation and high-fidelity mechanistic simulations.