ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
X-energy, Dow apply to build an advanced reactor project in Texas
Dow and X-energy announced today that they have submitted a construction permit application to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission for a proposed advanced nuclear project in Seadrift, Texas. The project could begin construction later this decade, but only if Dow confirms “the ability to deliver the project while achieving its financial return targets.”
Joel A. Kulesza, Roger L. Martz
Nuclear Technology | Volume 195 | Number 1 | July 2016 | Pages 44-54
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NT15-121
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper extends the verification and validation of MCNP6’s unstructured mesh (UM) features for neutron transport capabilities by comparing code and experimental results for two different sets of experiments. The first set of experiments comprises time-of-flight spectrum measurements of spheres pulsed by 14-MeV neutrons performed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the early 1970s. The second set of experiments comprises spontaneous fission neutron attenuation measurements in relatively simple geometries with varying shield thicknesses performed by Ueki et al. in the early 1990s. First, traditional constructive solid geometry (CSG) models are analyzed to ensure agreement with experimental values and to form a basis of comparison with UM results. For the pulsed sphere experiments, a series of UM calculations is performed using first-order tetrahedral elements with various levels of mesh refinement. For the Ueki experiments, purely CSG, purely UM, and hybrid CSG/UM calculations are performed using first- and second-order tetrahedral and hexahedral elements. In the purely UM cases, two different meshing algorithms are used to specify the first-order tetrahedral mesh. The pulsed sphere calculated and experimental time-of-flight spectra agree with p-values >0.999 when compared using χ2 goodness-of-fit tests. Furthermore, the UM results show discrepancies with the experimental values comparable to the CSG cases. The Ueki neutron attenuation calculated values using track-length and point detector tallies agree with the experimental values within 1σ with a single exception that agrees well within 2σ. As such, we conclude that the results for the CSG and UM calculations agree among themselves and with the experimental quantities when considering the associated statistical uncertainties.