ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fusion Energy
This division promotes the development and timely introduction of fusion energy as a sustainable energy source with favorable economic, environmental, and safety attributes. The division cooperates with other organizations on common issues of multidisciplinary fusion science and technology, conducts professional meetings, and disseminates technical information in support of these goals. Members focus on the assessment and resolution of critical developmental issues for practical fusion energy applications.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Joel A. Kulesza, Roger L. Martz
Nuclear Technology | Volume 195 | Number 1 | July 2016 | Pages 44-54
Technical Paper | doi.org/10.13182/NT15-121
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
This paper extends the verification and validation of MCNP6’s unstructured mesh (UM) features for neutron transport capabilities by comparing code and experimental results for two different sets of experiments. The first set of experiments comprises time-of-flight spectrum measurements of spheres pulsed by 14-MeV neutrons performed by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory in the early 1970s. The second set of experiments comprises spontaneous fission neutron attenuation measurements in relatively simple geometries with varying shield thicknesses performed by Ueki et al. in the early 1990s. First, traditional constructive solid geometry (CSG) models are analyzed to ensure agreement with experimental values and to form a basis of comparison with UM results. For the pulsed sphere experiments, a series of UM calculations is performed using first-order tetrahedral elements with various levels of mesh refinement. For the Ueki experiments, purely CSG, purely UM, and hybrid CSG/UM calculations are performed using first- and second-order tetrahedral and hexahedral elements. In the purely UM cases, two different meshing algorithms are used to specify the first-order tetrahedral mesh. The pulsed sphere calculated and experimental time-of-flight spectra agree with p-values >0.999 when compared using χ2 goodness-of-fit tests. Furthermore, the UM results show discrepancies with the experimental values comparable to the CSG cases. The Ueki neutron attenuation calculated values using track-length and point detector tallies agree with the experimental values within 1σ with a single exception that agrees well within 2σ. As such, we conclude that the results for the CSG and UM calculations agree among themselves and with the experimental quantities when considering the associated statistical uncertainties.