ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Mathematics & Computation
Division members promote the advancement of mathematical and computational methods for solving problems arising in all disciplines encompassed by the Society. They place particular emphasis on numerical techniques for efficient computer applications to aid in the dissemination, integration, and proper use of computer codes, including preparation of computational benchmark and development of standards for computing practices, and to encourage the development on new computer codes and broaden their use.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Byong-Jo Yun, Dong-Jin Euh, Chul-Hwa Song
Nuclear Technology | Volume 156 | Number 1 | October 2006 | Pages 56-68
Technical Paper | Thermal Hydraulics | doi.org/10.13182/NT06-A3773
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Hydraulic phenomena in the downcomer of a conventional pressurized water reactor have an important effect on the transient evaluations of a postulated large-break loss-of-coolant accident (LBLOCA). In particular, safety analyses using best-estimate codes show that downcomer boiling is one of the important phenomena in the postulated LBLOCA because it can degrade the hydraulic head in the downcomer and consequently affect the reflood flow rate for core cooling. To experimentally identify the thermal-hydraulic behavior in the downcomer, a downcomer-boiling test facility was constructed for simulating downcomer boiling in the reflood phase of a postulated LBLOCA.The test facility was designed by adopting a full-pressure, full-height, and full-size downcomer-gap approach but with the circumferential length reduced 47.08-fold. The test was divided into two phases: (a) visual observation and acquisition of the global two-phase flow parameters and (b) measurement of the local two-phase flow parameters.This paper presents the test results from Phase I. The major measured parameters were the axial void fraction and the fluid temperatures and pressures in the test section. The measured data were used to evaluate a safety analysis code, MARS 2.1b, to investigate its modeling accuracy and identify weaknesses of the thermal-hydraulic models therein.