ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Yu-Huai Shih, Shih-Jen Wang, Kai-Cheng Chuang, Tzu-En Huang
Nuclear Technology | Volume 186 | Number 3 | June 2014 | Pages 340-352
Technical Paper | Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT12-145
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The Fukushima Daiichi accident occurred on March 11, 2011. A seismic event and tsunami induced an extended station blackout plus loss of the ultimate heat sink. Three units progressed into a core melt severe accident. The accident occurred in the emergency operation procedure (EOP) domain. However, this situation was already beyond the scope of an EOP. The operator followed the EOP faithfully, and a core melt situation still occurred. An interesting topic is whether it is possible to avoid this type of accident. The purpose of this study is to survey the Fukushima accident progression with respect to the effect of the containment venting strategy for the Chinshan Nuclear Power Plant EOPs. Under the emergency situation, only a small reactor pressure vessel (RPV) injection system was available. This type of accident may be avoided by an early shift from the EOP to the severe accident guideline (SAG), switching from high-pressure injection to low-pressure injection while the reactor core isolation cooling system is available, gradually lowering the RPV pressure, and maximizing the injection flow rate. The plant responses and accident physical phenomena were simulated using MAAP5. The results show that the consequences of an uncovered core and core melt can be avoided by adopting the proper RPV depressurization and containment venting strategy.