ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Aerospace Nuclear Science & Technology
Organized to promote the advancement of knowledge in the use of nuclear science and technologies in the aerospace application. Specialized nuclear-based technologies and applications are needed to advance the state-of-the-art in aerospace design, engineering and operations to explore planetary bodies in our solar system and beyond, plus enhance the safety of air travel, especially high speed air travel. Areas of interest will include but are not limited to the creation of nuclear-based power and propulsion systems, multifunctional materials to protect humans and electronic components from atmospheric, space, and nuclear power system radiation, human factor strategies for the safety and reliable operation of nuclear power and propulsion plants by non-specialized personnel and more.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Jan S. Muransky, John G. Shatford, Craig E. Peterson, Gregg B. Swindlehurst
Nuclear Technology | Volume 148 | Number 1 | October 2004 | Pages 48-55
Technical Paper | RETRAN | doi.org/10.13182/NT04-A3547
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
For certain steam line break (SLB) analyses, the RETRAN-3D Oconee model predicts water carryout through the break. The amount of liquid carried from the system is dependent on the assumed break size, feedwater boundary conditions, and initial conditions. Although liquid carryout is potentially realistic during this scenario, there are no plant or test facility data on which to validate the amount of water carryout.Because the steam generator tube stress evaluation is a safety related analysis, a conservative approach is required. Overcooling effects for an SLB transient are maximized by retaining as much steam generator liquid as possible to remove energy from the reactor coolant system. Because water carryout is nonconservative, and due to the lack of data, the analysis is performed assuming no liquid is carried from the break. This boundary condition is difficult to impose on a RETRAN-3D analysis since the amount of liquid entrained in the break flow is determined by internal code models, which the analyst cannot control directly.This paper presents the methodology used to eliminate water carryout for these types of calculations. The methodology consists of a combination of special RETRAN-3D code modifications and model input changes.In the second part of the paper, the results of an SLB analysis for the Oconee Nuclear Station employing the above methodology are presented. These analyses are done to compute the temperature differences between the steam generator tubes and the shell of the once-through steam generator. The temperature of the thin tubes decreases much faster than the temperature of the shell during an overcooling transient such as an SLB, resulting in tensile stresses that might lead to tube failures.A number of break sizes were analyzed starting with a double-ended main SLB down to a small break of 0.0372 m2 (0.4 ft2). The sensitivity of the tube tensile stress to the assumed break size is presented.