ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
60 Years of U: Perspectives on resources, demand, and the evolving role of nuclear energy
Recent years have seen growing global interest in nuclear energy and rising confidence in the sector. For the first time since the early 2000s, there is renewed optimism about the industry’s future. This change is driven by several major factors: geopolitical developments that highlight the need for secure energy supplies, a stronger focus on resilient energy systems, national commitments to decarbonization, and rising demand for clean and reliable electricity.
Yassin A. Hassan, Andrey A. Troshko
Nuclear Technology | Volume 119 | Number 1 | July 1997 | Pages 29-37
Technical Paper | Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT77-A35392
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The thermal-hydraulic CATHARE V1.3U code has been used to simulate an International Standard Problem (ISP38) experiment conducted at BETHSY Integral Test Facility located in Grenoble, France. This experiment presents simulation of the loss of residual heat removal system during midloop operation. It involved opening of the pressurizer man way and steam generator outlet plenum man way simultaneously with switching on the heating rod power to simulate the decay heat. The total power level of 138 kW was kept unchanged throughout the test. Mass discharge through both manways led to core boiling and uncovery. The test was stopped when the primary cooling system was filled back to a midloop level. Overall, the code’s prediction and experimental data were found to be in reasonable qualitative agreement. However, the code underestimated the time of the core uncovery and the actuation of the gravity feed injection because of the overprediction of the discharge through the steam generator man way during the initial stage of the transient. This was caused by misestimation of the phase separation effect at the hot leg/surge line tee junction and significant water entrainment into the surge line at the beginning of the test. It was found that the upward tee junction model needs to be refined for the low-pressure transients.