ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Robotics & Remote Systems
The Mission of the Robotics and Remote Systems Division is to promote the development and application of immersive simulation, robotics, and remote systems for hazardous environments for the purpose of reducing hazardous exposure to individuals, reducing environmental hazards and reducing the cost of performing work.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Luder Tibkin, Mahmoud El-Beshbeeshy, Riccardo Bonazza, Michael L. Corradini
Nuclear Technology | Volume 111 | Number 1 | July 1995 | Pages 92-104
Technical Paper | Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT95-A35147
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Detonation wave theory was applied to the physical process of a vapor explosion. Initially, our experimental observations using hot water as the fuel and saturated refrigerant liquid as the coolant were analyzed with this technique. These tests are notable since peak explosion pressures were far below the critical pressure of the coolant. From the analysis, the volume fractions of the coolant vapor and the volume ratio of the two liquids prior to the explosion were estimated from the measured peak explosion pressures and associated explosion propagation velocities under the assumption that the process was steady and one-dimensional. Complete Hugoniot curves were constructed, and the detonation condition was initially determined under the assumption that flow velocity behind the shock was equal to the mixture sound speed. This assumption was checked with the tangency condition between the Rayleigh line and Hugoniot curve at the Chapman-Jouguet point, as well as the existence of a minimum in the entropy change across the shock wave. The point of minimum entropy showed good agreement with the graphical tangency point, but was slightly different than the sound speed criteria in pressure (<2%) with a larger difference in propagation speed (50%). This discrepancy between the three criteria becomes insignificant as the explosion pressure rises. This is demonstrated by examining a tin-water explosion experiment. This technique appears to be a useful tool to estimate initial conditions for subcritical vapor explosions.