ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
August 24–27, 2026
Dallas, TX|Hilton Anatole
Latest Magazine Issues
Jun 2026
Jan 2026
2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
July 2026
Nuclear Technology
June 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
May 2026
Latest News
Energy subcommittee discusses nuclear reform bills, draft legislation
The U.S. House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Energy turned its attention to nuclear permitting reform at a June 9 hearing—looking at a total of six proposals.
M. E. Dunn, B. Basoglu, C. L. Bentley, C. Haught, M. J. Plaster, A. D. Wilkinson, T. Yamamoto, H. L. Dodds
Nuclear Technology | Volume 111 | Number 2 | August 1995 | Pages 183-196
Technical Paper | Nuclear Criticality Safety Special / Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT95-A35129
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The multigroup Monte Carlo code KENO V.a and the 238- and 44-energy-group ENDF/B-V cross-section libraries were validated for 233U systems. Fifty-one critical experiments involving 233UO2(NO3)2, 233UO2F2, or 233U metal were selected for the validation. The H/233U ratios for the experiments range from 0 to 1986. Each experiment was modeled with KENO V.a, and the effective multiplication factor keff was calculated for each system using the 44- and 238-group ENDF/B-V, the 27- and 218-group ENDF/B-IV, and the 16-group Hansen-Roach cross-section libraries. The mean calculated keff for all experiments using the 44- and 238-group libraries is 1.0090 ± 0.0021 and 1.0064 ± 0.0020, respectively. For comparison, the mean calculated keff using the 27-, 218-, and 16-group libraries is 1.0142 ± 0.0038, 1.0125 ± 0.0038, and 0.9991 ± 0.0019, respectively. In general, an improvement exists in the agreement between the calculated keff’s and the experimental results (i.e., keff= 1.0) obtained with the newer ENDF/B-V libraries relative to ENDF/B-IV.