ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Supporting ANS now, for the future
Hash Hashemianpresident@ans.org
From kindergarten classrooms to national security facilities, each event I attended during the opening weeks of the new year underscored one truth: The future of nuclear energy depends on the people we inspire, educate, and empower today.
I had a busy start to 2026, first speaking at the Nashville Energy and Mining Summit alongside Tennessee Electric Cooperative Association senior vice president Justin Maierhofer to explore the necessary synergies among policy, academic coursework, research, and industry expertise in accelerating American nuclear innovation. Drawing on experiences in high-level government relations and public affairs and decades of work in nuclear instrumentation advancements, we discussed Tennessee’s nuclear renaissance, workforce development, and policy frameworks that support emerging energy demands.
Tzou-Shin Ueng, William J. O’Connell
Nuclear Technology | Volume 108 | Number 1 | October 1994 | Pages 80-89
Technical Paper | Radioactive Waste Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT94-A35044
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
For a nuclear waste package emplacement in a potential repository in partially saturated rock, a rock rubble or backfill zone may act more as a barrier than as a pathway for diffusive release of radionuclides. We approximate the diffusive transport process using one-dimensional, one-and two-barrier geometries. The one-barrier model suffices when the effective diffusion coefficient in the first zone, the rubble, is substantially lower than that in the second zone, the host rock. For more generality, such as two zones of comparable diffusivities, or for an additional barrier zone, we model two barrier zones both of finite extent. We present solutions for three types of radionuclide mobilization at the source: a pulse transient input, a steady input rate, and a constant concentration. The algebraic series form of the solutions aids analysis of sensitivity of breakthrough times and peak release rates. For the one-zone case, dimensionless parameters allow plotting of the family of transient solutions on a single graph. Comparisons between results of one- and two-zone models and with published results for different geometries and solution methods support verification of the solutions in this study.