ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
RIC panel discusses pathway to fusion commercialization
Fusion leaders at the Nuclear Regulatory Commission’s annual Regulatory Information Conference discussed the path forward for regulating the burgeoning fusion industry. The speakers discussed government and private industry initiatives in the United States and United Kingdom, with a focus on efforts shaping the near-term deployment of commercial fusion machines.
A recurring theme was the need to explain the difference between fission and fusion. Representatives from the Department of Energy and Type One Energy highlighted this as an important distinction for regulators, as it will allow fusion to undergo its own independent maturation process for developing standards and regulations in the same way that fission has. Lea Perlas, Fusion Program director at the Virginia Department of Health, said that confusion between fission and fusion has been a common cause for misplaced concerns among community members surrounding Commonwealth Fusion Systems’ proposed fusion plant site near Richmond, Va.
Mark T. Leonard
Nuclear Technology | Volume 108 | Number 3 | December 1994 | Pages 320-337
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT94-A35015
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Several probabilistic risk assessments (PRAs) have identified containment loads accompanying reactor vessel failure as a major contributor to the probability of early containment failure during severe accidents. Two significant contributors to these loads are phenomena referred to as “steam spike” and “direct containment heating.” To date, direct application of experimental and analytical studies of these phenomena to boiling water reactors (BWRs) are constrained by two limitations: (a) they are based on applications of large, complex containment response analysis computer codes, for which values of many major input parameters are highly uncertain, or (b) they only address pressurized water reactor containment designs. Relatively simple, parametric models are developed which allow a PRA analyst to evaluate the range of conditions under which steam spike or direct containment heating may be important contributors to containment loads for postulated severe accidents in BWRs. The models have been applied to a representative BWR/4 Mark I containment design to illustrate calculated results.