ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Installations Safety
Devoted specifically to the safety of nuclear installations and the health and safety of the public, this division seeks a better understanding of the role of safety in the design, construction and operation of nuclear installation facilities. The division also promotes engineering and scientific technology advancement associated with the safety of such facilities.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Curt M. Betts, Mark R. Galvin, Janet R. Green,† V. Melvin Guymon, Stephen M. Slater,‡, Andrew C. Klein
Nuclear Technology | Volume 105 | Number 3 | March 1994 | Pages 395-410
Technical Paper | Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT94-A34939
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Currently, no comprehensive mechanistic model for the two-phase flow through a swirl vane steam separator is available. Therefore, an attempt has been made to develop an analytical model, using fundamental fluid mechanics, which is capable of predicting separator performance over a wide range of conditions. The developed model subdivides a typical boiling water reactor swirl vane steam separator into four distinct regions: the standpipe region, the swirl vane region, the transition region, and the free vortex region. In each region, the vapor and liquid components are treated separately and the behavior of individual droplets is determined from the drag force induced by the vapor continuum. The analytical model is used to first determine the vapor velocities throughout the separator. The drag force on the droplets is then determined, and the droplets are tracked through the separator in order to determine the exit position of each droplet. Separator performance can then be determined from this final position in terms of the fraction of droplets removed from the flow stream. In order to assess the validity of this model, the computer code SEPARATOR was developed. Among other capabilities, the code is capable of determining separator performance in terms of carryover, carryunder, and exit quality. However, due to the simplicity of the single-phase fluid treatment of the vapor continuum and the lack of data related to the average droplet diameter for flows of this nature, the results are not of significant quantitative value. The investigation performed does, however, suggest that the developed methodology, upon refinement of the single-phase fluids treatment, will yield quantitatively accurate results for nearly all separator operating conditions of interest.