ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Robotics & Remote Systems
The Mission of the Robotics and Remote Systems Division is to promote the development and application of immersive simulation, robotics, and remote systems for hazardous environments for the purpose of reducing hazardous exposure to individuals, reducing environmental hazards and reducing the cost of performing work.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Norway’s Halden reactor takes first step toward decommissioning
The government of Norway has granted the transfer of the Halden research reactor from the Institute for Energy Technology (IFE) to the state agency Norwegian Nuclear Decommissioning (NND). The 25-MWt Halden boiling water reactor operated from 1958 to 2018 and was used in the research of nuclear fuel, reactor internals, plant procedures and monitoring, and human factors.
Dwayne A. Chesnut
Nuclear Technology | Volume 104 | Number 2 | November 1993 | Pages 182-192
Technical Paper | Special Issue on Waste Management / Radioactive Waste Management | doi.org/10.13182/NT93-A34882
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Waste packages for a U.S. nuclear waste repository are required to provide reasonable assurance of maintaining substantially complete containment of radionuclides for 300 to 1000yr after closure and of permitting only controlled release of radionuclides for 10000 yr. The waiting time to failure for complex failure processes affecting engineered or manufactured systems is often found to be an exponentially distributed random variable. Assuming that this simple distribution can be used to describe the failures of hypothetical singlebarrier waste packages, bounding calculations show that the mean time to failure would have to be >107 yr in order to provide reasonable assurance of meeting this requirement. If such a waste package could be manufactured, it would be practically impossible to demonstrate its performance within the repository preclosure time of 40 yr. With two independent barriers, each would need to have a mean time to failure of only 105 yr to provide the same reliability, illustrating that the use of redundant independent barriers is the key to both achieving and demonstrating regulatory compliance. However, even this demonstration would require testing tens of thousands of two-barrier systems for several decades. As more barriers are added, the mean lifetime required of each individual barrier decreases, and the demonstration of performance becomes more feasible, although still requiring extensive testing and observation during the preclosure period for performance confirmation. In any case, the results illustrate that neither the engineered barrier system nor the geologic barrier system alone is likely to provide the required degree of assurance of repository safety.