ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
Nuclear Energy Conference & Expo (NECX)
September 8–11, 2025
Atlanta, GA|Atlanta Marriott Marquis
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jul 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
August 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Deep Space: The new frontier of radiation controls
In commercial nuclear power, there has always been a deliberate tension between the regulator and the utility owner. The regulator fundamentally exists to protect the worker, and the utility, to make a profit. It is a win-win balance.
From the U.S. nuclear industry has emerged a brilliantly successful occupational nuclear safety record—largely the result of an ALARA (as low as reasonably achievable) process that has driven exposure rates down to what only a decade ago would have been considered unthinkable. In the U.S. nuclear industry, the system has accomplished an excellent, nearly seamless process that succeeds to the benefit of both employee and utility owner.
Yoshinori Miyoshi, Masafumi Itagaki, Masanori Akai, Hideyuki Hirose, Masao Hashimoto
Nuclear Technology | Volume 103 | Number 3 | September 1993 | Pages 380-391
Technical Paper | Nuclear Criticality Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT93-A34858
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
In the nuclear criticality safety design of a nuclear fuel cycle facility, the geometric buckling of the fuel core is one of the most important quantities used in estimating criticality. When the material buckling value is known for a system consisting of fissile materials, it is possible to judge whether or not the system is subcritical by comparing the material buckling with the geometric buckling. It is widely known that the geometric buckling of a given core can be calculated by using a simple formula for some geometries, e.g., square, cylinder, slab, and sphere. The experimental results of the geometrical buckling for typical regular polygons are described. Geometric buckling for three types of regular polygons has been measured in light-water-moderated UO2-H2O lattices in the tank-type critical assembly at the Japan Atomic Energy Research Institute. Based on the known critical buckling of a given experimental lattice and the measured critical water levels, the horizontal buckling has been evaluated for various sizes of regular hexagonal, square, and regular triangular cores. This method is based on the separability of geometric buckling into horizontal and vertical components. From the measured critical water levels of each core, it was found that the horizontal buckling of the effective core region is inversely proportional to the square of the radius of the circumscribed circle of the core. The geometric buckling can therefore be expressed in the form of (aN/Rc)2 using the geometric constant aN. The data for geometric buckling values on these geometries are available for the validation of calculation codes, and the empirical formula for geometric buckling obtained in this study can be applied to the basic criticality safety design of fuel cycle facilities.
