ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Accelerator Applications
The division was organized to promote the advancement of knowledge of the use of particle accelerator technologies for nuclear and other applications. It focuses on production of neutrons and other particles, utilization of these particles for scientific or industrial purposes, such as the production or destruction of radionuclides significant to energy, medicine, defense or other endeavors, as well as imaging and diagnostics.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
Norway’s Halden reactor takes first step toward decommissioning
The government of Norway has granted the transfer of the Halden research reactor from the Institute for Energy Technology (IFE) to the state agency Norwegian Nuclear Decommissioning (NND). The 25-MWt Halden boiling water reactor operated from 1958 to 2018 and was used in the research of nuclear fuel, reactor internals, plant procedures and monitoring, and human factors.
Edward T. Dugan, Samer D. Kahook
Nuclear Technology | Volume 103 | Number 2 | August 1993 | Pages 139-156
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT93-A34839
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Static and dynamic neutronic analyses have been performed on an innovative burst-mode (hundreds of megawatts output for a few thousand seconds) Ultrahigh-Temperature Vapor Core Reactor (UTVR) space nuclear power system. This novel reactor concept employs multiple neutronically coupled fissioning cores and operates on a direct closed Rankine cycle using a disk magnetohydrodynamic generator for energy conversion. The UTVR includes two types of fissioning core regions: (a) the central Ultrahigh-Temperature Vapor Core (UTVC), which contains a vapor mixture of highly enriched UF4fuel and a metal fluoride working fluid and (b) the UF4 boiler column cores located in the BeO moderator-reflector region. The gaseous nature of the fuel, the fact that the fuel is circulating, the multiple coupled fissioning cores, and the use of a two-phase fissioning fuel lead to unique static and dynamic neutronic characteristics. Static neutronic analysis was conducted using two-dimensional Sn transport theory calculations and three-dimensional Monte Carlo transport theory calculations. Circulating-fuel, coupled-core point reactor kinetics equations were used for analyzing the dynamic behavior of the UTVR. In addition to including reactivity feedback phenomena associated with the individual fissioning cores, the effects of core-to-core neutronic and mass flow coupling between the UTVC and the surrounding boiler cores were also included in the dynamic model. The dynamic analysis of the UTVR reveals the existence of some very effective inherent reactivity feedback effects that are capable of quickly stabilizing this system, within a few seconds, even when large positive reactivity insertions are imposed. If the UTVC vapor-fuel density feedback is suppressed, the UTVR is still inherently stable because of the boiler core liquid-fuel volume feedback; in contrast, suppression of the vapor-fuel density feedback in “conventional” gas core cavity reactors causes them to become inherently unstable. Because of the strength of the negative reactivity feedback in the UTVR, it is found that external reactivity insertions alone are inadequate for bringing about significant power level changes during normal reactor operations. Additional methods of reactivity control, such as variations in the gaseous fuel mass flow rate, are needed to achieve the desired power level control.
