ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
U.K. releases new plans to speed nuclear deployment
In an effort to revamp its nuclear sector and enable the buildout of new projects, the U.K. has unveiled a sweeping set of changes to project deployment. These changes, which are set to come into effect by the end of next year, will restructure the country’s regulatory and environmental approval framework and directly support new growth through various workforce efforts.
Joon Gi Ahn, Nam Zin Cho, Jung Eui Kuh
Nuclear Technology | Volume 103 | Number 1 | July 1993 | Pages 114-121
Technical Note | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT93-A34834
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The response rate of ex-core detectors depends on the power level, power distribution, and reactor configuration. For the analysis of the detector response rate for various core power distributions, it is important to generate spatial weighting functions that are insensitive to small changes in the core power distribution and determined by the reactor configuration. Two-dimensional discrete ordinates adjoint transport calculations are used to calculate the core axial weighting functions. The effects of the reactor operating conditions on the core axial weighting functions are analyzed, and it is found that the soluble boron concentration in the reactor coolant has little effect while the core power level affects the core axial weighting functions significantly. A comparison between the results of the adjoint and forward transport calculations shows an excellent agreement. However, the adjoint transport method provides more detailed data and requires less computing time than the forward transport method.