ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Mathematics & Computation
Division members promote the advancement of mathematical and computational methods for solving problems arising in all disciplines encompassed by the Society. They place particular emphasis on numerical techniques for efficient computer applications to aid in the dissemination, integration, and proper use of computer codes, including preparation of computational benchmark and development of standards for computing practices, and to encourage the development on new computer codes and broaden their use.
Meeting Spotlight
2024 ANS Winter Conference and Expo
November 17–21, 2024
Orlando, FL|Renaissance Orlando at SeaWorld
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Aug 2024
Jan 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2024
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
August 2024
Latest News
Nuclear new build procurement considerations
It may seem counterintuitive, but the best time to enhance the ability to support operations and maintenance for a new plant is before construction starts. This is one of many lessons learned by the currently operating nuclear fleet. As construction and startup of many nuclear facilities was completed, it quickly became evident that the ability to efficiently support operations and maintenance was limited. Most of the information necessary to establish and manage procurement of spare and replacement items, maintenance, and configuration of the facilities was unavailable and had to be gathered on a case-by-case, “on-demand” basis. Absence of necessary information and the associated challenges resulted in the need for staff augmentation and multiyear-long projects to develop equipment bills of material and maintenance programs and to perform technical evaluations for the huge quantities of spare and replacement items being requested.
Robert E. Henry, James P. Burelbach, Robert J. Hammersley, Christopher E. Henry, George T. Klopp
Nuclear Technology | Volume 101 | Number 3 | March 1993 | Pages 385-399
Technical Paper | Severe Accident Technology / Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT93-A34795
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Under severe accident conditions, the most crucial action for recovery from the accident state is to cool the core debris and prevent or terminate attack on the remaining fission product barriers. One means of preventing attack on the containment structures is to retain the core debris within the reactor vessel. The Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) accident demonstrated that this could be accomplished by water resident within the reactor vessel combined with injection on a continual basis to quench the debris and remove decay heat over the long term. Some accident situations could result in the transport of molten core debris to the lower plenum, as occurred to some extent (∼20 tonnes) during the TMI-2 accident, boiloff of water in the lower plenum, and an inability to add water to the reactor coolant system (RCS). In this extreme set of circumstances, sufficient external reactor pressure vessel (RPV) cooling may be available to prevent failure of the RPV lower head and, thereby, retain the core debris within the vessel. Containment configurations like Zion would result in substantial accumulation of water around the lower parts of the reactor vessel for most accident sequences. For some pressurized water reactor containments, there could be substantial water accumulation around the reactor vessel and the hot and cold legs before core damage and drainage of debris to the lower plenum. If this water could directly contact the carbon steel vessel surface and RCS piping, substantial energy could be removed from the primary system and in particular the RPV lower head. The experiments, which were performed in support of the Commonwealth Edison individual plant examination and accident management programs, are heat transfer tests designed to demonstrate that nucleate boiling is the dominant heat removal process from the outer surface of a simulated RPV lower head surrounded by typical reflective insulation used in nuclear power plants. With this heat removal mechanism on the outer surface, the heat flux is limited by thermal conduction through the carbon steel head, both for the experiments and for a reactor system. Experiments were performed in which the reactor vessel lower head was simulated with a 0.32-m (12.75-in.)-o.d. pipe cap. Wall thicknesses of 1.75 cm (0.688 in.) and 3.3 cm (1.312 in.) were used to provide substantially different heat fluxes to the outer surface. The heat source was molten iron thermite at a temperature of ∼2400 K, which was poured onto the dry inner surface of the lower head. Water provided cooling on the outer surface. Both uninsulated and insulated configurations were investigated. The measured heat fluxes were essentially the same for these two different cases. This clearly demonstrates that the water flow rate through the insulation is sufficient to supply cooling water to the RPV outer surface under such accident conditions. In addition, the measured heat fluxes are well in excess of those that can be attributed to film boiling. Hence, the vessel outer surface was cooled by nucleate boiling during the entire transient.