ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Paul E. Murray
Nuclear Technology | Volume 100 | Number 1 | October 1992 | Pages 135-140
Technical Note | Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT92-A34759
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The numerical solution of heat transfer problems may involve substantial execution time, and much of the execution time may be spent in the matrix solver. Iterative solution methods may be more efficient than direct methods for solving a large matrix equation. Although iterative methods have been applied to many fields of engineering simulation, they are not widely used in nuclear reactor simulation. Moreover, the selection of a suitable iterative method depends on the problem. Heat transfer in nuclear reactors is a complex process that includes solid conduction, fluid advection, radiation, and convection between solid and fluid. Thus, the feasibility of matrix iterative solution methods is investigated, and the numerical performance of a selected iterative method is assessed. The preconditioned generalized conjugate residual (PGCR) method is an iterative method used in the integrated systems code (ISC) to simulate heat transfer in a modular high-temperature gas-cooled reactor. The numerical performance of the PGCR method is assessed to determine the computational requirements of the ISC. A steady-state heat transfer problem that includes conduction, convection, advection, and radiation heat transfer is solved in the performance study. The execution time of the PGCR method is obtained in the cases of four matrix sizes and three values of the heat transfer Biot number. The Biot number is varied to examine a complete range of convective heat transfer conditions. The execution time per equation is 0.22 to 0.55 ms on the Cray X-MP and 1.6 to 5.0 ms on the Dec 5000 workstation. These results show that the PGCR method is effective for nuclear reactor heat transfer calculations and provides an efficient and reliable computational performance.