ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Antonio F. Dias, Laurance D. Eisenhart, Diane M. Bell, Terry J. Garrett, Glenn J. Neises, Lance J. Agee
Nuclear Technology | Volume 100 | Number 2 | November 1992 | Pages 193-202
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT92-A34742
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The steamline break accident is one of several specified severe transients addressed in the final safety analysis report for any pressurized water reactor plant as part of the licensing procedure. A rupture in a main steamline in the secondary system causes a sudden cooling of the water in the corresponding primary loop. The cold water flowing into part of the core represents a positive reactivity insertion that must be contained by control rods, which are scrammed into the core almost immediately. Later in the scenario, soluble boron reaches the core from the emergency core cooling system. When simulating a steamline break accident during the licensing procedure, many conservative assumptions are added to the transient description. Historically, a steamline break analysis is performed with a system analysis code like RETRAN, using a rather simplified (point kinetics) description of the core. The three-dimensionality of the event within the core is accounted for by constant “blending factors,” which are used to calculate the evolving point kinetics parameters based on a simplistic cold and hot partition of the core. The ARROTTA-01 and VIPRE-02 computer codes are coupled to allow a detailed three-dimensional simulation of the reactor core during a steamline break event. The results show that a much milder transient is observed than when a point kinetics treatment was used. Test cases study the influence of different core modeling considerations on the overall simulation. The advent of very fast and extremely affordable computing machines (e.g., workstations) should cause the review of some of the simplified approaches initially adopted for many core simulations. More complex and detailed codes can now be routinely employed.