ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Nuclear Criticality Safety
NCSD provides communication among nuclear criticality safety professionals through the development of standards, the evolution of training methods and materials, the presentation of technical data and procedures, and the creation of specialty publications. In these ways, the division furthers the exchange of technical information on nuclear criticality safety with the ultimate goal of promoting the safe handling of fissionable materials outside reactors.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Min Lee, Jiing-Huae Wu
Nuclear Technology | Volume 98 | Number 3 | June 1992 | Pages 289-306
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT92-A34660
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Operators need to initiate feed-and-bleed (F&B) cooling to depressurize and cool down the reactor coolant system (RCS) of a pressurized water reactor (PWR) in the event of a loss of all feedwater. Long-term responses of the RCS and containment of a PWR in the loss-of-all-feedwater event with and without F&B cooling are analyzed with the Modular Accident Analysis Program (MAAP) computer code. Results of the MAAP analyses are compared with those from the RELAP5/MOD2 code. Results of the MAAP analyses show that the execution of F&B cooling at 48 min, as the steam generator secondary-side water level reaches a 6%-wide range, could depressurize the RCS along the coolant saturation curve with an average cooldown rate of 13 K/h. The conditions of the RCS reach the entry point of the residual heat removal system at ∼7 h. The RCS could still be depressurized if the execution of the F&B cooling operation is delayed to 70 and 100 min, i.e., ∼6 min after steam generator secondary-side dryout and 2 min after core uncovery, respectively. The average RCS cooldown rate, however, is above the limit specified in the technical specifications. Delaying execution of F&B cooling to 133 min can still depressurize the RCS. That, however, is too late to prevent the core from melting. Plant characteristics that are important for the responses of the RCS to F&B cooling are the flow capacity and the setpoints of the pressurizer power-operated relief valves, the flow rate, and the shutoff head of the high-head safety injection system. Results of the MAAP calculations need to be interpreted carefully because of the simplified nature of the MAAP code. Benchmark exercises of the MAAP input deck against the sophisticated system analysis code are essential for the validity of the MAAP results.