ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2025 ANS Winter Conference & Expo
November 9–12, 2025
Washington, DC|Washington Hilton
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Sep 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
September 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
October 2025
Latest News
NN Asks: What did you learn from ANS’s Nuclear 101?
Mike Harkin
When ANS first announced its new Nuclear 101 certificate course, I was excited. This felt like a course tailor-made for me, a transplant into the commercial nuclear world. I enrolled for the inaugural session held in November 2024, knowing it was going to be hard (this is nuclear power, of course)—but I had been working on ramping up my knowledge base for the past year, through both my employer and at a local college.
The course was a fast-and-furious roller-coaster ride through all the key components of the nuclear power industry, in one highly challenging week. In fact, the challenges the students experienced caught even the instructors by surprise. Thankfully, the shared intellectual stretch we students all felt helped us band together to push through to the end.
We were all impressed with the quality of the instructors, who are some of the top experts in the field. We appreciated not only their knowledge base but their support whenever someone struggled to understand a concept.
Richard R. Hobbins, David A. Petti, Daniel J. Osetek, Donald L. Hagrman
Nuclear Technology | Volume 95 | Number 3 | September 1991 | Pages 287-307
Technical Paper | Nuclear Reactor Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT91-A34578
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Results from integral-effects core melt progression experiments and from the examination of the damaged core of the Three Mile Island Unit 2 (TMI-2) reactor are reviewed to gain insight on key severe accident phenomena. The experiments and the TMI-2 accident represent a wide variety of conditions and physical scales, yet several important phenomena appear to be common to core melt progression. Eutectic interactions between core materials cause the formation of liquids and loss of original core geometry at low temperatures (∼1500 K) in a severe accident. The first liquids to form are metallic in nature, and they relocate to lower elevations in the core, where they may freeze into a crust that forms a partial flow blockage. At temperatures above ∼2200 K, fuel liquefaction causes fuel-bearing debris to accumulate in the core above the metallic lower crust. The liquefied material oxidizes in steam as it relocates, and the accumulated melt can incorporate unmelted fuel rod debris. The result is the formation of a molten ceramic pool above the metallic crust. This molten pool can be uncoolable, as was the case in the TMI-2 accident, but failure of the peripheral crust can cause a coherent relocation of core melt to the lower plenum of the reactor and fragmentation of the melt in water to form a coolable debris (as occurred in the TMI-2 accident). Fission product release early in a severe accident is controlled by diffusion through solid fuel and is strongly influenced by microstructural features such as cracks and grain-boundary porosity interlinkage. Cracking due to rapid cooling (e.g., during reflooding) can enhance fission product release, as can liquefaction. Fission product release from the molten pool is controlled by bubble dynamics and the oxygen potential within the pool. Some inventory of volatile fission products, among others, remains in the melt, even after relocation to the lower plenum.