ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Reactor Physics
The division's objectives are to promote the advancement of knowledge and understanding of the fundamental physical phenomena characterizing nuclear reactors and other nuclear systems. The division encourages research and disseminates information through meetings and publications. Areas of technical interest include nuclear data, particle interactions and transport, reactor and nuclear systems analysis, methods, design, validation and operating experience and standards. The Wigner Award heads the awards program.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
K. Sathyanarayana, Donald M. Ogden
Nuclear Technology | Volume 92 | Number 2 | November 1990 | Pages 194-203
Technical Paper | Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT90-A34470
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A modified version of the RELAP5/MOD2 thermal-hydraulic computer code is used to perform anticipated transient without scram (ATWS) calculations for the N Reactor. The ATWS calculations are performed for a spectrum of transients to determine the accident end state in support of the Level 2/3 probabilistic risk assessment. The predicted N Reactor response to a most severe, but highly unlikely accident, due to the postulated double-ended guillotine break of the cold-leg manifold combined with the failure of scram systems, is described. The calculated core melt frequency for the N Reactor due to such an event is <10−10/yr. The transient response for this event is predicted using a single-loop, eight-level core RELAP5/ MOD2 model of the N Reactor. The reactor power behavior is modeled using point-reactor kinetics. The kinetics model includes the contributions to the reactivity from the feedback effects of core void, fuel, graphite, and water temperature variations. To verify the basic response of the model, the RELAP5 analysis results for the scram transient are compared with a twodimensional neutronics code (TWIGL) calculation. The excess reactivity results for the loss-of-coolant accident, combined with simultaneous failure of scram systems, compare favorably with three-dimensional neutronics code (3DN) computations. The analysis also shows that the fuel temperatures during the transient have increased sufficiently in the top 30% of the core leading to fuel failure. The fuel temperatures are predicted assuming a constant power profile. However, the neutronics code calculations show that the normalized power varies from 100% at the core bottom to <5% at the top for 50% voided core. Therefore, the analysis provides a very conservative estimate of fuel temperatures for the transient.