ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Roland L. Roche, C. H. A. Townley, Kurt Vinzens, H. Laue, Franco Corsi, M. De Bacci
Nuclear Technology | Volume 86 | Number 3 | September 1989 | Pages 233-238
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A34291
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
The development of fast breeder reactor (FBR) design codes in Europe has been determined by the way in which the FBR itself has developed. Until 4 yr ago, there were four main streams of development, each largely independent, but with a small amount of international participation. In parallel with the independent development of reactor systems in Europe, different approaches to design codes have emerged. Until the Superphénix project, there was a deliberate attempt to avoid developing any formal code before proceeding with design and construction. France is the only European country to have published a complete code concerning FBR components: RCC-MR (Regies de Construction et de Conception des Matériels mécaniques des Réacteurs rapides—Design and Construction Rules for Mechanical Equipment in Fast Breeder Reactors). In 1984, five European governments (Belgium, France, Italy, the United Kingdom, and the Federal Republic of Germany) agreed to a coordinated program for FBR research, development, and construction. The ultimate outcome must be a common design code. Drawing up such a design code represents a major challenge in the field of international collaboration. It seems likely that the existing RCC-MR code will be used as the starting point for the development of European design rules. Recently, European manufacturers set up a committee with the object of amending and supplementing RCC-MR.