ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Radiation Protection & Shielding
The Radiation Protection and Shielding Division is developing and promoting radiation protection and shielding aspects of nuclear science and technology — including interaction of nuclear radiation with materials and biological systems, instruments and techniques for the measurement of nuclear radiation fields, and radiation shield design and evaluation.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
2024: The Year in Nuclear—July through September
Another calendar year has passed. Before heading too far into 2025, let’s look back at what happened in 2024 in the nuclear community. In today's post, compiled from Nuclear News and Nuclear Newswire are what we feel are the top nuclear news stories from July through September 2024.
Stay tuned for the top stories from the rest of the past year.
Russell D. Mosteller, Peter J. Jensen, Michael J. Anderson,+ Laurance D. Eisenhart, Rana Abdollahian, Jason Chao, Walter J. Eich
Nuclear Technology | Volume 86 | Number 1 | July 1989 | Pages 40-48
Technical Paper | Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A34280
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A pressurized water reactor (PWR) with a positive moderator temperature coefficient of reactivity is potentially susceptible to a severe overheating transient. This study identifies a scenario in which such a transient could occur and is similar in some respects to the accident at Chernobyl Unit 4. The scenario so identified is a natural circulation test at beginning of life under the assumption that all scrams are disabled. The results obtained demonstrate that a runaway power excursion does not occur and that the domestically designed PWR that was analyzed displays inherently safe behavior for the chosen scenario. The analysis is performed using two codes in tandem over three sequential stages of the analysis. Since the transient is assumed to be quasi-steady-state, steadystate calculations first are performed with the advanced three-dimensional core simulation code ARROTTA to generate a moderator reactivity table for input to the point kinetics model in the RETRAN-02 systems transient code. The entries in this table are taken directly from ARROTTA results, so they implicitly contain three-dimensional reactivity effects. Next, a RETRAN-02 transient analysis is performed for the system as a whole. This analysis serves two purposes: It predicts the overall behavior of the plant during the transient, and it also produces time-dependent forcing functions for ARROTTA. Finally, ARROTTA is run in a transient mode, providing a detailed description of the behavior of the core during the transient. The high level of consistency produced by the two transient calculations validates the initial assumption of quasisteady-state behavior. A methodology that may be applied to the analysis of this and similar transients is developed and tested as part of this study.