ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Accelerator Applications
The division was organized to promote the advancement of knowledge of the use of particle accelerator technologies for nuclear and other applications. It focuses on production of neutrons and other particles, utilization of these particles for scientific or industrial purposes, such as the production or destruction of radionuclides significant to energy, medicine, defense or other endeavors, as well as imaging and diagnostics.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
Russell D. Mosteller, Peter J. Jensen, Michael J. Anderson,+ Laurance D. Eisenhart, Rana Abdollahian, Jason Chao, Walter J. Eich
Nuclear Technology | Volume 86 | Number 1 | July 1989 | Pages 40-48
Technical Paper | Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A34280
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A pressurized water reactor (PWR) with a positive moderator temperature coefficient of reactivity is potentially susceptible to a severe overheating transient. This study identifies a scenario in which such a transient could occur and is similar in some respects to the accident at Chernobyl Unit 4. The scenario so identified is a natural circulation test at beginning of life under the assumption that all scrams are disabled. The results obtained demonstrate that a runaway power excursion does not occur and that the domestically designed PWR that was analyzed displays inherently safe behavior for the chosen scenario. The analysis is performed using two codes in tandem over three sequential stages of the analysis. Since the transient is assumed to be quasi-steady-state, steadystate calculations first are performed with the advanced three-dimensional core simulation code ARROTTA to generate a moderator reactivity table for input to the point kinetics model in the RETRAN-02 systems transient code. The entries in this table are taken directly from ARROTTA results, so they implicitly contain three-dimensional reactivity effects. Next, a RETRAN-02 transient analysis is performed for the system as a whole. This analysis serves two purposes: It predicts the overall behavior of the plant during the transient, and it also produces time-dependent forcing functions for ARROTTA. Finally, ARROTTA is run in a transient mode, providing a detailed description of the behavior of the core during the transient. The high level of consistency produced by the two transient calculations validates the initial assumption of quasisteady-state behavior. A methodology that may be applied to the analysis of this and similar transients is developed and tested as part of this study.