ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Education, Training & Workforce Development
The Education, Training & Workforce Development Division provides communication among the academic, industrial, and governmental communities through the exchange of views and information on matters related to education, training and workforce development in nuclear and radiological science, engineering, and technology. Industry leaders, education and training professionals, and interested students work together through Society-sponsored meetings and publications, to enrich their professional development, to educate the general public, and to advance nuclear and radiological science and engineering.
Meeting Spotlight
Conference on Nuclear Training and Education: A Biennial International Forum (CONTE 2025)
February 3–6, 2025
Amelia Island, FL|Omni Amelia Island Resort
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Jan 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
February 2025
Nuclear Technology
January 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
2024: The Year in Nuclear—July through September
Another calendar year has passed. Before heading too far into 2025, let’s look back at what happened in 2024 in the nuclear community. In today's post, compiled from Nuclear News and Nuclear Newswire are what we feel are the top nuclear news stories from July through September 2024.
Stay tuned for the top stories from the rest of the past year.
Karen H. Koger, M. Jonathan Haire, Brett L. Humphrys, Jay F. Manneschmidt, Keiichi Setoguchi, Ryodai Nakai
Nuclear Technology | Volume 85 | Number 3 | June 1989 | Pages 251-258
Technical Paper | Fission Reactor | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A34247
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Availability information contained within the Centralized Reliability Data Organization (CREDO) liquid-metal reactor (LMR) data base is presented, and the availability critical items lists are developed. Individual components are ranked in prioritized lists from worst to best performers from an availability standpoint. Availability, as used here, is assumed to be an inherent characteristic of the component and is not necessarily assumed to be related to plant operability. A major observation is that of ∼5000 components analyzed at each reactor site, a few components have a much higher unavailability factor than the average. In particular, 15 components contribute 93, 77, and 87% of the total system unavailability for the Experimental Breeder Reactor II, the Fast Flux Test Facility, and the Japanese Experimental Fast Reactor (JOYO), respectively. Critical components common to all three sites are mechanical pumps and electromagnetic pumps. By identifying components in this way, site personnel will be more efficient in their attempts at increasing overall system availability; i.e., attention can be focused on components that have a high contribution to overall system unavailability. All three sites demonstrate that low maintainability (i.e., long repair times) is about twice as likely to contribute to unavailability of a component than unreliability (i.e., high failure rates). The analyses were conducted using data and information from CREDO, the largest repository of LMR component reliability data in the world. The system is cosponsored by the U.S. Department of Energy and the Power Reactor and Nuclear Fuel Development Corporation of Japan. The CREDO data base contains information on a population of >20 000 components and addresses ∼1500 events (i.e., abnormal component occurrences). A conservative estimation is that total component operating hours approaches 2.2 billion hours.