ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fuel Cycle & Waste Management
Devoted to all aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle including waste management, worldwide. Division specific areas of interest and involvement include uranium conversion and enrichment; fuel fabrication, management (in-core and ex-core) and recycle; transportation; safeguards; high-level, low-level and mixed waste management and disposal; public policy and program management; decontamination and decommissioning environmental restoration; and excess weapons materials disposition.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Feb 2025
Jul 2024
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
March 2025
Nuclear Technology
Fusion Science and Technology
February 2025
Latest News
Colin Judge: Testing structural materials in Idaho’s newest hot cell facility
Idaho National Laboratory’s newest facility—the Sample Preparation Laboratory (SPL)—sits across the road from the Hot Fuel Examination Facility (HFEF), which started operating in 1975. SPL will host the first new hot cells at INL’s Materials and Fuels Complex (MFC) in 50 years, giving INL researchers and partners new flexibility to test the structural properties of irradiated materials fresh from the Advanced Test Reactor (ATR) or from a partner’s facility.
Materials meant to withstand extreme conditions in fission or fusion power plants must be tested under similar conditions and pushed past their breaking points so performance and limitations can be understood and improved. Once irradiated, materials samples can be cut down to size in SPL and packaged for testing in other facilities at INL or other national laboratories, commercial labs, or universities. But they can also be subjected to extreme thermal or corrosive conditions and mechanical testing right in SPL, explains Colin Judge, who, as INL’s division director for nuclear materials performance, oversees SPL and other facilities at the MFC.
SPL won’t go “hot” until January 2026, but Judge spoke with NN staff writer Susan Gallier about its capabilities as his team was moving instruments into the new facility.
B. Thierry Meslin
Nuclear Technology | Volume 84 | Number 3 | March 1989 | Pages 239-246
Technical Paper | Probabilistic Safety Assessment and Risk Management / Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT89-A34205
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Electricité de France has conducted a probabilistic safety study on one of its 1300-MW(electric) reactors since the beginning of 1986. Practically all the reliability data used in this study are derived from the experience feedback from EdF’s pressurized water reactor units. The data concerning common-cause failures (CCFs) are therefore calculated on the basis of the information in EdF’s national files or on-site investigations. For most of the components (in particular, pumps and valves), the SRDF (system for gathering reliability data) and the event file of EdF’s Nuclear and Fossil Generation Division were used and >1200 data sheets were analyzed. Approximately 100 data sheets concerning CCFs were identified and CCF rates were deduced using the binomial failure rate method. In addition, a number of exhaustive investigations were carried out at the site chosen for the probabilistic study and samples of CCFs were analyzed in qualitative terms. The results were taken into account in the studies, and corrective actions were implemented on the site. Several observations were made on the basis of this work. The CCFs seem inevitable as they are of a complex and variable nature: problems of design or operation, meteorological conditions, human error, etc. As a result, it is very difficult to find a simple remedy and the number of solutions is often equal to the number of cases observed. Experience feedback is of fundamental importance to the rapid identification and correction of CCFs, especially for utilities that, like EdF, operate many standardized units. Finally, it appears that quantification of the problem is possible to a certain extent and that the order of magnitude of the rates of order 2 (ß2) CCFs is relatively well known, as is that of most components of order 0.1. The determination of the β rates at higher orders (β3, β4, etc.) still seems to be full of uncertainties, however.