ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Mathematics & Computation
Division members promote the advancement of mathematical and computational methods for solving problems arising in all disciplines encompassed by the Society. They place particular emphasis on numerical techniques for efficient computer applications to aid in the dissemination, integration, and proper use of computer codes, including preparation of computational benchmark and development of standards for computing practices, and to encourage the development on new computer codes and broaden their use.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Thomas E. Blue
Nuclear Technology | Volume 82 | Number 3 | September 1988 | Pages 304-310
Technical Paper | Radioisotopes and Isotope Separation | doi.org/10.13182/NT88-A34131
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An accelerator-based 145Sm production method is described. A target of a natural samarium compound, for example, Sm2O3, is bombarded with protons in the 70-MeV energy range. The resulting nuclear reactions produce 145Eu as well as other europium isotopes that are chemically separated from the samarium target. If this separation is performed more than 15 min following the irradiation, then only 145Eu and europium isotopes with half-lives longer than the halflife of 145Eu remain in the europium fraction. Following the first separation, the separated europium undergoes radioactive decay until most of the 145Eu in the europium fraction has decayed into 145Sm. Then, a second chemical separation is performed in which the 145Sm is removed from the long-lived europium radioactivities that accompanied the 145Eu in the first separation. The result of the two chemical separations is a high-specific-activity 145Sm product with contaminations from europium radioactivities that depend on the efficiencies of the separations and the time of their performance. The 145Sm yield and purity for this production method for a high-current accelerator are compared with the yield and purity of 145Sm from a reactor-based production method for a high-flux reactor. The yield of 145Sm/day for the accelerator-based production method exceeds the yield per day for the reactor-based production method for reactor targets less than ∼1 g. For modest ratios of europium-to-samarium separation efficiencies for the first separation (∼10), the specific activity of the accelerator-produced 145Sm exceeds the specific activity of the reactor-produced 145Sm for reactor irradiation times <2 days. However, the activity of the 145Sm contaminants is larger for the accelerator-produced 145Sm than for the reactor-produced 145Sm, unless the ratio of europiumto-samarium separation efficiencies for the second separation is greater than ∼5000.