ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Division Spotlight
Fuel Cycle & Waste Management
Devoted to all aspects of the nuclear fuel cycle including waste management, worldwide. Division specific areas of interest and involvement include uranium conversion and enrichment; fuel fabrication, management (in-core and ex-core) and recycle; transportation; safeguards; high-level, low-level and mixed waste management and disposal; public policy and program management; decontamination and decommissioning environmental restoration; and excess weapons materials disposition.
Meeting Spotlight
ANS Student Conference 2025
April 3–5, 2025
Albuquerque, NM|The University of New Mexico
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Apr 2025
Jan 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
May 2025
Nuclear Technology
April 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
General Kenneth Nichols and the Manhattan Project
Nichols
The Oak Ridger has published the latest in a series of articles about General Kenneth D. Nichols, the Manhattan Project, and the 1954 Atomic Energy Act. The series has been produced by Nichols’ grandniece Barbara Rogers Scollin and Oak Ridge (Tenn.) city historian David Ray Smith. Gen. Nichols (1907–2000) was the district engineer for the Manhattan Engineer District during the Manhattan Project.
As Smith and Scollin explain, Nichols “had supervision of the research and development connected with, and the design, construction, and operation of, all plants required to produce plutonium-239 and uranium-235, including the construction of the towns of Oak Ridge, Tennessee, and Richland, Washington. The responsibility of his position was massive as he oversaw a workforce of both military and civilian personnel of approximately 125,000; his Oak Ridge office became the center of the wartime atomic energy’s activities.”
Carol Braester, Roger Thunvik
Nuclear Technology | Volume 79 | Number 3 | December 1987 | Pages 371-376
Technical Paper | Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow | doi.org/10.13182/NT87-A34026
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
An analysis of the confidence of flow solutions for stochastically generated hard rock formations study was carried out with the aid of a simplified synthetic model. The formation was conceptualized as a fracture network with a known geometric structure intersecting an impervious mass rock while fracture permeability was considered a stochastic process. Safety analysis of radioactive waste repositories includes prediction of travel times of possibly contaminated water particles from the repository to the biosphere. While such calculations require that rock properties, such as permeability, be known over the entire flow domain, only limited information is available in practice, and interpolation methods are called for. An a priori model was constructed as a first step, with fracture permeabilities generated according to a given probability distribution; this a priori model was considered the “true” formation. In a second step, a limited amount of information, similar to that obtained in reality from boreholes, was used to construct a conditioned-by-measurement model. Identical flow tests were performed on formations represented by the two models, and the flow rate ratios resulting from these tests served as the measure of confidence of the stochastically generated formation. Results with a two-dimensional flow domain and a particular data set, show uncertainty values between 46 and 61%, corresponding to borehole spacing from 10 to 100 m intersecting 11 and 2%, respectively, of the total number of fractures in the network. Results with a three-dimensional flow domain show uncertainty values between 17 and 50%, corresponding to borehole spacing from 25 to 100 m intersecting 0.2 and 0.02%, respectively, of the total number of fractures. Calculations indicate that stochastically generated formation properties may lead to nonconservative results. This suggests that overestimation methods such as using permeability values obtained from an envelope passing through the highest values should be employed in order to obtain conservative results.
