ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
NRC looks to leverage previous approvals for large LWRs
During this time of resurging interest in nuclear power, many conversations have centered on one fundamental problem: Electricity is needed now, but nuclear projects (in recent decades) have taken many years to get permitted and built.
In the past few years, a bevy of new strategies have been pursued to fix this problem. Workforce programs that seek to laterally transition skilled people from other industries, plans to reuse the transmission infrastructure at shuttered coal sites, efforts to restart plants like Palisades or Duane Arnold, new reactor designs that build on the legacy of research done in the early days of atomic power—all of these plans share a common throughline: leveraging work already done instead of starting over from square one to get new plants designed and built.
Alexander P. Murray
Nuclear Technology | Volume 77 | Number 2 | May 1987 | Pages 194-209
Technical Paper | Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT87-A33984
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
Two mathematical models have been derived for chemical decontamination of nuclear reactor films, starting from mass transfer and kinetic fundamentals. The first model predicts a linear field decrease with time, while the second model implies an exponential decrease. Both models are compared to Westinghouse experimental data. The exponential model agrees very well with the boiling water reactor decontamination data, generating gross rate constants of 0.875 to 1.105 h−1 at 121°C. Neither model correlates well with the pressurized water reactor data. This modeling exercise indicates that field decrease versus time is a better approach than the raw “decontamination factor” normally presented in the literature. It also suggests that specimen effective surface area and related properties should be measured. Both avenues should be pursued in future decontamination programs.