ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Standards Program
The Standards Committee is responsible for the development and maintenance of voluntary consensus standards that address the design, analysis, and operation of components, systems, and facilities related to the application of nuclear science and technology. Find out What’s New, check out the Standards Store, or Get Involved today!
Latest Magazine Issues
Dec 2025
Jul 2025
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
January 2026
Nuclear Technology
December 2025
Fusion Science and Technology
November 2025
Latest News
What’s the most difficult question you’ve been asked as a maintenance instructor?
Blye Widmar
"Where are the prints?!"
This was the final question in an onslaught of verbal feedback, comments, and critiques I received from my students back in 2019. I had two years of instructor experience and was teaching a class that had been meticulously rehearsed in preparation for an accreditation visit. I knew the training material well and transferred that knowledge effectively enough for all the students to pass the class. As we wrapped up, I asked the students how they felt about my first big system-level class, and they did not hold back.
“Why was the exam from memory when we don’t work from memory in the plant?” “Why didn’t we refer to the vendor documents?” “Why didn’t we practice more on the mock-up?” And so on.
Paul W. Marshall, Jeffrey B. Lutz, James L. Kelly
Nuclear Technology | Volume 76 | Number 3 | March 1987 | Pages 400-407
Technical Paper | Chemical Processing | doi.org/10.13182/NT87-A33925
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
A need for characterization of the iodine source term used in safety calculations for hypothesized light water reactor core disruptive accidents has motivated a study in iodine volatility. Previous experimental studies have been directed at evaluating volatility of iodine at a single time shortly (1 to 12 h) after introduction into the aqueous phase. The very important variables of time in solution and gamma radiation dose rate for a range of iodine concentrations (10-8 to 10-5 gI/ml) and pHs(5, 9, and 11) are explored. All experiments were performed at ∼25°C, first in the absence of a significant radiation field and later with a gamma radiation dose rate ranging from 0.003 to 0.06 Mrad/h. Iodine was introduced as either molecular I2 or Nal with 131I(8.04-day half-life) as a tracer. Results of experiments with nonirradiated systems indicated very little volatility with Nal-initiated studies. The I2-initiated systems at pH 5 were the most volatile whereas experiments at pH 9 and 11 showed decreasing iodine volatility with time. From the experiments at pH 9, it is inferred that the partition coefficient of HOI is ∼1000. A pronounced radiation-induced reduction in iodine volatility in pH 5 iodide solutions has been demonstrated as well as a dose rate dependence in the transient phase. As with nonirradiated systems, irradiated alkaline solutions exhibit low volatility. A computer-based model incorporating water radiolysis and iodine radiolytic chemical reactions has been formulated and tested. The model successfully predicts radiation-induced volatility changes in pH 5 iodide systems. The experimentally observed dose rate dependence is also verified. At pH 9, the agreement between experimental results and predicted results is not good.