ANS is committed to advancing, fostering, and promoting the development and application of nuclear sciences and technologies to benefit society.
Explore the many uses for nuclear science and its impact on energy, the environment, healthcare, food, and more.
Explore membership for yourself or for your organization.
Conference Spotlight
2026 ANS Annual Conference
May 31–June 3, 2026
Denver, CO|Sheraton Denver
Latest Magazine Issues
Mar 2026
Jan 2026
Latest Journal Issues
Nuclear Science and Engineering
April 2026
Nuclear Technology
February 2026
Fusion Science and Technology
Latest News
2025 annual assessments out for U.S. reactors
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has released its 2025 annual performance assessments of the country’s 95 operating commercial nuclear reactors. And of the 95 reactors, all but five earned the highest marks.
Nuclear power plant assessments can fall under one of five categories: Licensee Response, Regulatory Response, Degraded Cornerstone, Degraded Performance, and Unacceptable Performance. Ninety reactors fell under Licensee Response, the highest performance category in safety and security. Plants that achieve this level of performance are subject to a Reactor Oversight Process (ROP) baseline inspection.
Anton Bayer
Nuclear Technology | Volume 71 | Number 1 | October 1985 | Pages 217-227
Technical Paper | Nuclear Safety | doi.org/10.13182/NT85-A33720
Articles are hosted by Taylor and Francis Online.
As a continuation of the “German Risk Study: Phase A,” further plant-oriented analysis has been performed and the off-site accident consequence model has been partially improved. The plant-oriented analysis carried out at the Karlsruhe Nuclear Research Center has been focused on two release categories, namely FK2 (core meltdown followed by immediate release of radionuclides from the leaking containment) and FK6 (core meltdown followed by late release of radionuclides as a result of failure due to overpressure in the containment). The thermohydraulic processes in the molten mass and the behavior of the fission and activation products released from the molten mass are considered in a more realistic way. The improvements of the off-site accident consequence model relate mainly to a more realistic modeling of the deposition and resuspension processes, to the ingestion submodel, and to dose factors. The results show that the improvements of the off-site accident consequence model do not change the final results dramatically; the model rather draws a more realistic picture of the interrelated processes, and consequently allows the application of the model to other problems in the nuclear field as well. From the investigations belonging to the plant-oriented analysis it appears, however, that the releases to be expected from postulated accidents are remarkably lower. Consequently, the risk is lower than assessed in Phase A of this study.